My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1996 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1996
>
02-26-1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:10:29 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:10:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 26, 1996 <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />• <br />( #10) VALEK PROPERTY PARK ACCESS RIGHT -OF -WAY <br />Moorse reported that the discussion relates to the 9 -1/2 acre tax forfeit parcel. The <br />Valek's requested that a 1/2 acre be added to their property, which the Council had <br />indicated agreement to, with the condition that the City retain and relocate a piece of <br />right of way through their property to gain access to the tax forfeit parcel. Moorse said <br />the Valek's ask that the right of way not be retained. <br />Mr. Valek said he has never been interested in seeing an access go through his property <br />to the park land. He believes the right of way to be a utility easement, and was told so by <br />Jeanne Mabusth as well as being so designated on his abstract. Now he is concerned that <br />the right of wav is being shown as a bike trail. <br />Callahan asked Valek why he should be given the property without compensation. Valek <br />said he had shown his hardship and would be willing to pav the 8% park dedication fee <br />and pay for the land. <br />Callahan said he had no objection to the land being acquired from the County by Valek <br />but the City was not in the position to act on the property at this time. Callahan said he <br />would need to have proof of an adequate access to the park land before any further <br />• decisions are made. <br />Jabbour was informed by Gaffron that the 10' right of way was a dedicated public right of <br />way, which was donated and dedicated as an alley in 1891, and which has not been <br />vacated. Jabbour agreed with Callahan that an access must be maintained to the park <br />land. <br />• <br />A potential optional access has recently been proposed by the Fairview Church through <br />its property. It has not yet been determined if adequate access is available or if <br />arrangements are feasible. Gaffron noted this would require an easement from the <br />church. <br />Mr. Valek said the County has told him the 1/2 acre has no ties to the park property <br />disposition. Mrs. Valek asked if the Citv obtained reasonable access. would the council <br />be willing to split off the 1/2 acre parcel. Callahan said it was possible if agreement could <br />be made between the County and City and the Valeks. He asked the Valek's to continue <br />working with Staff, adding that consideration would be given to releasing the 1/2 acre <br />when access to the park land has been gained, but where that access will come from has <br />not yet been determined. Callahan reitereated that the City is awaiting the County's <br />decision on the disposition of the tax forfeit parcel. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.