My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
12-08-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2012 4:06:42 PM
Creation date
12/28/2012 4:06:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8, 1997 <br />( #9 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) <br />Goetten asked Barrett if it was fairly conclusive that approval should be granted as <br />meeting conditions. Barrett said that was true as far as density is concerned. <br />Gleason noted that the goal was for affordability and cost would increase if two <br />buildings were eliminated and a cul -de -sac added. He felt the private driveway aids <br />affordability. He noted the encumbrance of trees as well noting he was trying to meet a <br />lot of criteria with the plan. <br />Jabbour said the code is specific in its regard to cul -de -sacs. He noted the market price <br />is already over the limit of affordable housing. Jabbour indicated no hardship was <br />shown. Jabbour said either the code should be adhered to or the code changed. Jabbour <br />concluded that because of the density allowed by code and with the cul -de -sac, it would <br />result in a loss of trees. <br />Kelley noted the cul -de -sac would be located at the end of the private driveway. If unit <br />#7 was eliminated, there would be room for a cul -de -sac. Gleason said he understood <br />that but was trying to accommodate several trees but would support the cul -de -sac. <br />Flint asked how the traffic flow worked. The road and paved walkways were noted. <br />Gleason said if the units were staggered, a service door could be provided. He said he <br />normally builds courtyards into the project. Gleason said two separated walkways are <br />being provided where one would normally be shown. This is being done in order to save <br />trees. <br />Kelley was informed that there would be a homeowners association. He asked about <br />outdoor storage. Gleason said no outdoor storage would be allowed. No boats could be <br />placed in the driveway and cars would be allowed in the driveways only temporarily. <br />Van Zomeren referenced the restrictive covenant document noted under #7 on page 6 of <br />the resolution. Kelley questioned whether the Council should review that document. <br />Gleason said the homeowners association document would be submitted with the final <br />plat. Kelley said he would not want to wait until that point and have the Council deny it. <br />Jabbour said it would be more appropriate to give direction now on what is expected. <br />Jabbour informed Goetten that the Council can make conditions on a homeowners <br />association. Gleason said he would submit the document to staff. It was questioned <br />how that would assist enforcement since the document can be modified. Jabbour said <br />modifications would have to be part of the resolution. Gleason said a modification <br />would also require 100% approval, one denial would totally deny it, and would require <br />Council approval. While there is a time limit to the document, it is for 30 years. <br />Jabbour noted the document can be renewed for an additional six years. <br />Jabbour noted that there was a very limited street side to the units. He would like to <br />ensure that there is adequate parking. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.