My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
09-22-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 3:57:33 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 3:57:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />( #11 Shoreland and On -Site Sewage Treatment Ordinance Amendment - Continued) <br />• <br />The City had previously felt the Shoreland District should be a higher priority with the <br />septic systems lacking the 3' separation. Staff recommends failing systems be given <br />highest priority. <br />Gaffron reported that State regulations were reviewed and found to be ever changing. <br />The legislature has recently changed the separation allowance from 3' to 2' for existing <br />systems at the direction of the local government. This has a minimal impact on Orono as <br />those not meeting the separation generally have been found to have less than a 1' <br />separation. <br />Kelley asked how the State regulation was interpreted without a set time frame. Gaffron <br />indicated the DNR had recognized that and suggested a 2 year replacement time period in <br />its Model Shoreland Ordinance. <br />Jabbour said he understood and agreed with the regulation but has found that the DNR <br />ordinance is for the greater state at large and zeros in on the small older cottages on Waal <br />lakes throughout the state. Jabbour said most problems occur where the 1000' mark <br />touches a lot triggering the upgrade. Jabbour feels the City will be remedying the <br />situation and continue to work towards it. Jabbour said he did not agree with a Planning <br />Commissioner's comment regarding a longer upgrade time frame presenting a health <br />• hazard. <br />Gaffron said both Staff and Council have the same goal of protecting Lake Minnetonka. <br />Sewering is being done on the majority of properties around the lake. Gaffron said his <br />concern is with the time frame of 10 years in the Shoreland as being too long. He felt a <br />shorter time frame would be better. Gaffron suggested the sewer study regarding sewer <br />in the rural area be conducted and determinations made as to the extend of sewer in the <br />rural area; then the issue of septic replacement timeliness could be revisited. <br />Jabbour responded that he feels sewering is preferred by residents. If the current zoned <br />density can be maintained with sewer, the City may be able to sewer more properties. He <br />noted the highest density is by the lake. He agreed that all parties are attempting to move <br />in the same direction. <br />Jabbour asked Gaffron if he preferred a five year time frame. Gaffron said he would be <br />more comfortable with that figure. <br />Gaffron reviewed comments made by Septic Inspector, Steve Weckman. Weckman <br />questioned whether it would be fair to change the ordinance for those that have already <br />replaced their systems. Gaffron noted that this does not affect very many residents, <br />however. Some residents have placed funds in escrow for potential septic replacement, <br />and these residents will no longer need the escrow money set aside. This affects only <br />• about 3-4 residents. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.