Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#8) #2285 JOHN LATTERELLE, 3505 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - VARIANCE - • <br />RP.ROI.ITT ON NO. 3969 <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren distributed photographs of the property and a handout. <br />Van Zomeren said the request is for a 12'x26' deck on the north side of the residence in <br />the front yard requiring front, side, and structural coverage variances. The .15•ac <br />property is located in the LR -IC Zoning District. Per the Planning Commission <br />recommendation, the plan was revised to a 20'x 10' deck. <br />Van Zomeren reported that it was questioned how the residence was built on the lot. She <br />found that it had been historically a nuisance lot and deemed buildable in 1974. A side <br />yard variance was received at that time which was in part the street file information, but <br />on microfiche. The handout included information found on the microfiched records <br />indicating prior variances received in 1974. <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No, 3969 per Planning <br />Commission recommendation. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#9) NO AGENDA ITEM <br />(a #10) #2297 DARYL HANSEN FOR MRS. ROBERT KEITH, 1045 • <br />EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3970 <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3970. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays <br />0. <br />( #11) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - SHORELAND AND ON -SITE SEWAGE <br />TREATMENT, ORDINANCE NO. 162, 2ND SERIES <br />Gaffron reported that the Council had directed Staff to draft an amendment extending the <br />time period for septic system upgrade in the Shoreland District from 2 years to 10 years <br />to replace any system that does not meet the 3' separation. Staff was also directed to <br />revise the ordinance to eliminate the building permit process from triggering the septic <br />system upgrade. This results in the ordinance being consistent between Shoreland and <br />non- Shoreland properties. <br />The rationale behind this decision is the upcoming review of sewering of rural areas. The <br />high cost of septic system replacement is also a factor. There are a number of areas in <br />the rural area that could be scheduled for sewer, and it would not make sense to require <br />the septic improvement and then have sewer installed. <br />16 <br />