My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
07-28-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 3:50:08 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 3:48:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />• MEETING HELD ON JULY 28,1997 <br />( #5) #2254 CURTIS AND BARBARA PALMER, 2710 CASCO POINT ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 3932 <br />Van Zomeren reported that the request is a variance to add a 16'x5'9" space to the <br />existing garage. The garage is non - conforming due to its location in the street yard, 4'6" <br />off the property line. The request would result in added bulk to the structure. <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval on a 5:1 vote contrary to Staff s <br />recommendation for denial with storage space located elsewhere on the property. Van <br />Zomeren said Staff did not believe there was a hardship to justify the variance. <br />Curtis Palmer said the residence is on a steep hill and access to the rear of the property is <br />impossible resulting in it not being practical to build any storage unit elsewhere. He said <br />he would like the ability to have a small workshop in his garage as well as use it to store <br />his tools. <br />• Jabbour received confirmation from the applicant that the topography of the property <br />created the hardship and egress and ingress were difficult. <br />Palmer informed Goetten that the storage area would be for personal use. <br />Kelley said he agreed with Staff s recommendation. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to deny Application #2254. <br />Peterson said she had mixed feelings about the request. She said she agrees with the <br />applicant regarding the topography not allowing space for another structure. She asked <br />for clarification on whether the added structure would be located behind the garage. <br />Palmer said the space would be shown as a dormer in the front of the garage noting the <br />footprint would not change. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the elevations of the proposed structure. She indicated that the <br />garage was being raised to gain headroom and floor space. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.