My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2012 3:39:24 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 3:39:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL. <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 9,1997 <br />• ( #7 - #2241 Kyle Hunt and Partners - Continued) <br />Jabbour asked the applicant if he understood the terms of the resolution. Hunt said he <br />did. He said consideration had been given regarding reduction of hardcover to conform <br />to the 25% allowable if the garage stall was approved. Jabbour informed him if non - <br />conforming hardcover was removed, it would not be allowed to be added in the future. <br />Hunt asked if the hardcover was removed in the 0 -75' setback, if it could be gained in the <br />75 -250' setback. Jabbour said it could as long as the 25% hardcover requirement is met. <br />Goetten informed the applicant to work with staff. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( #8) #2182 HERBERT TERRY OLSON, 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3914 <br />W. Olson was present. <br />Van Zomeren reported that the 1.77 acre property is located in the LR -1A Zoning <br />District where two acres are required. The original proposal requesting relocation of the <br />existing garage 6 to the east was amended and existing survey represents the current <br />proposal. Van Zomeren indicated that the property is considered a through lot requiring <br />a CUP and street setback variance from 50' to 9' for the reconstruction of the existing <br />• garage in its current location. The Planning Commission recommended approval with a <br />5:2 vote. <br />Jabbour questioned what the hardships are for the proposal. Van Zomeren indicated the <br />hardships are the through lot status and the topography of the property. Van Zomeren <br />noted Exhibit I, the cost estimate to relocate the garage, was recommended by the <br />Planning Commission for Council review. The contractor's cost estimate includes <br />excavation and paving at an additional cost of $7,000. <br />Jabbour asked if the reconstruction of the garage would be on existing foundation. Van <br />Zomeren said it would include a new foundation but located in the same spot. <br />Goetten noted the steep topography. <br />Van Zomeren reported that a neighboring resident said the neighbors preferred the <br />proposed garage location to minimize lake view impact. <br />Olson had no additional comments. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant if he had any problems resulting from the use of the City <br />property bordering OIson's on the lake. Olson said he had very few problems. <br />0 There were no public comments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.