Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 9,1997 <br />( #7 - #2241 Kyle Hunt and Partners - Continued) <br />Jabbour asked if the applicant had any additional comments. Hunt reported that the - - -- - • <br />adjacent residence to the east is within 12' of the property line with outbuilding within 2. <br />The west side residence is within 15' of the property line. Hunt also noted that the _._ - <br />majority of homes in the neighborhood are not in compliance with code requirements and <br />questioned the intent of the ordinance. He reported that the residence is built on.pilings <br />and cannot be increased upward or downward. Hunt said consideration was given to <br />building the garage to the northwest but it would impact the 26' wetland separation and_. <br />increase hardcover beyond the 25% allowed. -- <br />Kelley was informed that the residence was built in 1981. Kelley said the 16i was <br />marginal at that time and the residence was built to maximize the lot. He said the owner <br />at that time was aware of the ordinance and no changes have occurred since that time_. <br />Kelley said he did not support the addition of the third garage stall. <br />Hunt was informed that the intent of the ordinance was to allow big homes built on large <br />lots and small homes on small lots. Jabbour reviewed the purposes of the 75' setback <br />requirement and 2 acre zoning. <br />Goetten informed Hunt that the residences not in compliance were generally built prior to <br />the zoning requirements. <br />.... ....... <br />Kelley noted that the current patio would never have been allowed and questioned <br />whether permits were obtained for its construction. • <br />Jabbour asked Staff to examine applications regarding code compliance and observance <br />of proper permit procedures at time of construction. <br />Goetten questioned where the 192 s.f of additional hardcover is located if the exercise <br />room is located under the existing deck. Hunt said the additional 192 s.f of hardcover <br />would be from the construction of the third garage stall. <br />Hunt questioned whether the obstruction of views was reviewed. Jabbour and Goetten <br />said they were familiar with the property. Peterson was informed that the view <br />obstruction noted by the adjacent neighbor would result from the garage stall- - <br />construction. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3913 per the Planning <br />Commission recommendation. <br />• <br />4 <br />