Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 13, 1997 <br />(96 - Proposed North Long Lake Sewer Projects - Continued) <br />Keith Gasner, 884 Dakota Avenue, questioned the $350 per unit charge. He noted the <br />neighboring area would gain a blacktopped road and the cost is spread amongst all <br />residents in the project, but those along Dakota Avenue would have to pay separately for <br />the blacktopping of Dakota Avenue without the cost spread amongst all involved in the <br />project. He questioned whether there would be a credit for the residents along Dakota <br />Avenue. Goetten informed him that the $1950 charge is for those along Dakota Avenue, <br />who would not receive any credit. She did note that if the cost was spread amongst all of <br />those in the project, it would cost $350. <br />Don Lund, 1465 Long Lake Boulevard, asked who makes the ultimate decision on what <br />properties are included in the project. Cook informed him the Council makes that <br />determination. Lund asked what rules were being followed noting the properties north, <br />south, and east of him were not included, yet he was included. Jabbour informed him <br />that "hot spots" for sewering were identified by the City where existing septic systems <br />were substandard, having primary and secondary septic sites with problems. He noted lot <br />sizes and developments were reviewed and a determination made through public <br />meetings for the limited number of sewer units available. Jabbour informed Lund that the <br />procedure to gain permission from the Met Council for the sewer units was over a long <br />time period. Lund questioned whether the size of the lot was a factor noting he had 2- <br />1/2 acres. Gaffron reported that Lund's property was included as sewer was projected to <br />serve properties on the same street as Lund. He did note Lund's property is larger than • <br />most and has a steeper topography. Gaffron said Staff has not closely reviewed each <br />property and can further review it regarding whether or not to include it if requested. <br />Kelley informed Lund that if he had the opportunity to hook up to sewer he would do"so <br />immediately. He noted the advantages of sewering, the cost of mound systems, system <br />failure, and new regulations on septic systems. <br />Lund asked if the cost of severing was based on so much per foot. Jabbour informed <br />Lund that if Staff finds it unnecessary to include his property, he may opt out. Lund said <br />he had not made that decision. Gaffron reported that criteria has not yet been set for the <br />project as it has in the past in regards to fringe properties. Jabbour explained that the <br />project did not become a reality until the end of 1996 and was only speculation up to that <br />point. He noted the septic rules established in 1978 and 1992 which laid out shoreland <br />regulations. Jabbour said there were probably 600 properties in Orono who would not <br />pass septic inspections at this time. He noted 25% of the systems are inspected yearly. <br />The City also had a 2 -year moratorium on requiring septic repairs. Jabbour said the State <br />legislature is reviewing cost and effect of the regulations. He also informed Lund that <br />whenever a property has septic, the residence is limited to the number of bedrooms <br />allowed. With sewering, the property has more options for expansion. <br />4 <br />