|
� "'xo Jeanne T,. ��:atiusth, Builc;; r.�, ; �
<br /> .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . �:t � .
<br /> Prom: Mic,hael t�. Gai �ron , t,sst i . ..,. ,. : . . . . . .. . • . .
<br /> Date: Auc�ust 7 , ? ygy
<br /> Subject: #1431 Luci.� taor� �:or. , :�ui,�li •,- i .
<br /> Se��tic rc�vi c:w
<br /> This is an ��c*rc�mely 1 imite�] :;it �•, , ,
<br /> of the F�roperty has s 1 oE�es in c�•,,cc. r; :, � �, �'� f i cant E. ortic.:�
<br /> clifficult to locate suitai�lc� cirain: ir�l ,; ' � :';��xinq i t •:c�r;
<br /> Z wauld make thP fo7 lowing CJIi,f'���;. ' �•�: � : �linq � t,� seE�tir
<br /> system information pro•i i dF�cl ( ��n�? ; . ; �, , ; �i ��; ) witt� thi c
<br /> suhdivision apF�lication :
<br /> 1• Proposed Lot 1 cont:ains ��n �•;: ; , ; ,,,,
<br /> � ;� ��:,•, The existin<
<br /> septie tank/clrainfieJ.cl syst �;•rn ;;<,��. :,�,• �,�•..,; c�rifirme�l �is tc�,
<br /> lacation, conc]iticn or r���iqr,. . . :, i , ,. i r,SE,c.ction found
<br /> no evidence of drainf ield or r �,r,r :,� i :: � t�� 1 ocaLion shown, �
<br /> alth�ugh our record carc3s h�,ri -� . � r�<, 1 1 y in:licat�c3 the
<br /> locati� - of that system in that � r�-�:.
<br /> It will be neressary for t}�e .� ,.;, ; , : n+. ��i� h�r agents to
<br /> locate the tanks and c3rainfael �3 r,:. : ;; 1 .,�, verify that the
<br /> system does not cross the propo�;�.�; i �,• . , „ ,
<br /> 2. The existing wel 1 location i s r.�,r -:�,cu.•��,r;ted. Since the
<br /> well locati.on lias �� signif i c �� r� � ,
<br /> dr.ainfield sites, it must Y�e foun�l r,•,-, 1 ,,1,���_��,n�, "n E'°��-'ntia 1
<br /> 3 . The proposed alternate dra� r:f ; �_ ; ; ::i te for I,ot 1 does
<br /> not meet minimum code stAndards. F'cr • ;.F�• �,4 MF�I ��ercolation
<br /> rate reported, the mound cann��� :,�-
<br /> _ ,. l :�c��r3 on slopes of
<br /> �reater than 6$. The proposed sit�• h��s sloE�es ranging from
<br /> 0$ to 138. Additionally, this 4-i, ,-:���r, homF would need a
<br /> dedicated �rea of aPproximately •;i, 'x�sr, � t;;u* rt,cets the soil
<br /> and slope criteria. Even if the ., l c,,�s r� t t t�is site were
<br /> suitable, the edges of the moun�? wc;. ; cl t,c� 10' from the new
<br /> lot linp rath�r than the 2U' rec;�_; i rec� , and the opposite
<br /> corner would be just a few feet fr�,;,, �,r�, ��xi .;ting F�r. ivate
<br /> driveway easement which, if ev�r -'.�::- .. ; � . -
<br /> si nificant � - 't�''�- , Wouid create
<br /> 9 problems for the mour�� .
<br /> In summary, the i.nformation provi �:�� � ; �>r ;,ot I is totally
<br /> inaclequate, incomplete, arid n�t tl:c,r ��u�;i, r�r comj�rehensive.
<br /> I had to go ttirough an actual c�c:; i ��:; l,rUCC SS for the mound
<br /> (since none was provided ) in orr3��i- � -, �?••� ,.rj, ;i;� Whether the
<br /> alternate sitE� was feasible.
<br />
|