|
= i �t31 Lucia Morisor� , SLuc3j.visian
<br /> I:uyust 8 , 1989
<br /> ' '<<��� 2 O£ 3
<br /> 4. I?egarc3inq pi•opos��c3 ;.oC 'l, ri�e ;-: . . . � . •� �, loc�,,! �• , .
<br /> the borde:r of a low �leE,r�ssic;r, , �,:; : . : : . • •�-; t�y :;t�..,,i
<br /> sl�pes, drainaye anci t he nei�Jlil��rit��r �;. _ . : :.vc t. aE%f,e��r:; t u
<br /> be only 1 cri entation for a n�c;unc3 �, ? �_ . . .. .. , • .• • t,a � ��-�tl r.,ce,
<br /> the criteria foi the mounc3 systEr, : � . . .; - r �::? room h�usc,
<br /> while allowinq the rerout.iny of �1r �� : ;, , t• • �; ,�rot�ct tt�ar
<br /> tnounc.] sitc•. This wi 11 foi'ce th�_ ��r��; : ,: . ; i,�,u�:,• :,ii�� 1t�t-o �.n
<br /> area of sloE,e r��nc�ing f rom 1 `_� !, t �� ; . . ; ;, ����I,f.r�� 1 , thi s
<br /> �nounc3 sit� is accc�tat�le fcr a 4-t,c•�?r�.- : �,c, �;�•, wouic3 r�ot bF�
<br /> large enough for a 5-bec?room housc•, . ::-; wi i 1 take carefu !
<br /> site planning anc] sit� gr.a�3i.ng wor'r. •��- �•;,�, :I ,� �� functional
<br /> system.
<br /> 5. �'he altc�rn�ite si te E,roE�o;;c�; � r,r :,c, . : ., 20U' to the
<br /> north , on the north �ic3e of tt,e e•r.i :, � it,<� �lrivcwa y which
<br /> b i s e e t s t he lo t. 7'liis northerly clr�, ir.: i �� i c? :;i tc has varied
<br /> topogra��hy that does not st�ow up cl c�r�r : •,• <,n tt�c• t:o�,ographic
<br /> survey. While some portions of thc� :, i � �• �,�, �,�-�F,far to be at
<br /> 3$ slope, a portion of the area i,���•;1���3 �or cirainfiel�i
<br /> appears to be at slopes of 6-lU ��. Ir, �,: -l._•r for r.his to be
<br /> verified as a viable si�e, the sitc: �•�, ., 1 ��� tc,r. will have to
<br /> stake the exact layout of a muunc3 �,�:, �.�:;;; ( E,resume a �l-
<br /> bedroom home) ana show that thc: � l �,�,c.:, t ;,1 uuyi,our. the treat-
<br /> ment area are a 1 1 1 ess tt�an 6�,.
<br /> This site also is just uphi 11 f r�_,: ,� �� � ,� i nac�eway that
<br /> �aral lels the privat� roac3 cominq f r c,: t;,�; r�orthwest. Thi�
<br /> drainageway is currently clry, and ; t , :; r, �r known to what
<br /> degree it is filled during wet season�,. �t'h�, c3rainage�•ay may
<br /> have some effect on tha� proper fur:ct : �;r. i r,�j o£ the mcund i£
<br /> the drainageway stays £ull oF water fc>: �,��n�e F,�riod of time.
<br /> The site evaluator did not. account :"��r r_::�� tc,�,oc�raphical
<br /> inconsistenciPs nor the drainaq�way i r, !� i s rev iew of this
<br /> site. A�ain, I had to go through �� cle:, i cr,. i,z-ocess in order
<br /> to verify whether thi s site was fe��:�i: : t:.
<br /> 6. In genera 1 , the proposed p 1 at 1 �:� •; �•�, i i t t 1 c� or no area
<br /> to p 1 aee a house thnt wi 1 1 not a f f ac:t c : i��• �f f ected by the
<br /> drainfield. The alternate plar , c�:-. �.�t, ich my seE�tic
<br /> information has beer plottec� , WUII l <: ,� 1 i ow a house sitc
<br /> directly sou�h downhill from the ��xist ir.�3 !�ouse, but in an
<br /> area wh�re slopes range from 20- 2 ; % . �I'h� a��� l icant must
<br /> c?etermine whether it is reason��k, l �� o: feasir�le to be
<br /> constr�cting a house in thi s 1 oca t i c.:�. ;, 1 so, Qi veu the
<br /> required setbncks and need for c3rivewa}�s, �tc, it would be a
<br /> poor decision to locate the hou:�e s��utt� of the pro�osed
<br /> primary mound site on Lot 2. In my ol,ir,i�n, this would lead
<br /> to nothing but major encroachments into the mound site
<br /> during construction as well as prc�t�abl e a�3ditional run-off
<br /> to the primary mound site that it ��oul �: nc.t t�andle.
<br />
|