Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />• MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 <br />( #12) #2372 BARRY HAGLUND, 4590 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST - continued <br />Jabbour commented that the City could not stop maintaining North Arm Lane because it would be <br />abandoning the road and would leave some of the property owners landlocked. Flint wanted to be <br />sure that the City is not encouraging development to the north by upgrading the road. <br />Janiece Haglund asked how long the process with the Watershed District would take. Gappa <br />responded that it would be a minimum of 30 days after filing the application. Jabbour added that <br />any subdivision application requires review by the Watershed District. The road issues will not <br />delay the subdivision application. <br />Janiece Haglund asked if they were not able to acquire the easement from the Armstrongs, if the <br />subdivision would be denied. Jabbour responded that the subdivision could be done providing they <br />could obtain access to the road. An outlot could be created, although this would not be desirable. <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4096 granting preliminary subdivision <br />approval for the property located at 4590 North Arm Drive. West. Vote: Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />• ( #13) #2373 STEVE BECK, 2795 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE <br />is <br />Mr. Beck was present. <br />Van Zomeren distributed pictures of the property and reported that the request was for a hardcover <br />variance to construct a lakeside deck away from the channel. Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of the hardcover variance on a 3 to 2 vote. The resolution is drafted to allow 4,022 s.f. of <br />hardcover or 43.48% in the 0 -75' zone, and 3,672 s.f. or 39.7% in the 75 -250' zone. Planning <br />Commission recommended removal of 40 s.f. from the sport court. <br />Beck noted the hardships for the lot include the difficult setbacks and channel noise which is <br />annoying to the family. The proposed deck is only T wide under a 2' overhang. Flowers will be <br />planted beneath the deck. _ <br />Goetten commented that 40 s.f. of removal was not enough to exchange for the deck. She would be <br />willing to vote for the deck if an equal amount of hardcover was removed. <br />Jabbour asked if the improvements to the property were legally non - conforming. Van Zomeren <br />stated there is no requirement for a building permit for the sport court. She could not confirm that <br />it was legally non - conforming from the information in the street file. <br />21 <br />