Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 <br />( #12) #2372 BARRY HAGLUND, 4590 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST - continued <br />Kelley suggested possible stormwater management fees similar to park dedication fees He also felt <br />the City should actively work on obtaining North Arm Lane as a City road. If the road needs to be <br />upgraded or bought from the Armstrongs, property owners on both sides of the road could be <br />assessed. <br />Jabbour did not want to make the applicant wait for the City to complete the road acquisition and <br />upgrade process. Kelley did not object to the applicant obtaining the necessary easements to <br />complete his subdivision while the City pursues the road issues. <br />Goetten asked if North Arm Lane was a public or private road. Gaffron explained that the City has <br />a prescriptive easement over approximately 15' of the gravel road. <br />Janiece Haglund asked for clarification of the triangular piece the City is requesting at North Arm <br />Lane and North Arm Drive. Gaffron explained that it is needed for right -of -way to make a 90 degree <br />intersection. Approximately 50' of right -of -way is being requested. Dedication for right -of -way <br />along North Arm Drive is also being requested. <br />CJ <br />Janiece Haglund expressed concern about screening at the corner that provides privacy for their lot • <br />if the City makes road improvements at the corner. Gappa responded that the City would replace <br />as much as possible providing the sight lines are maintained. <br />Janiece Haglund also asked for clarification of the pond requirements. Gaffron responded that the <br />Watershed District may conclude that a pond is required. If the Watershed District determines that <br />a pond is not required, then the City needs to decide if they will require a pond. Gaffron noted that <br />the City Engineer has requested some sort of ponding. Kellogg added that this subdivision meets <br />the Watershed District's requirement for a NURP pond. The applicant would need to provide to the <br />Watershed District calculations to show that post - development runoff from the site will be as good <br />as, or better than, what currently leaves the site to get a variance from the Watershed District not to <br />put a pond on the site. Kellogg recommended that a pond be installed because the site lends itself <br />to a pond, as opposed to the previous application where the lot was smaller. <br />Flint asked about the status of North Arm Lane being either rural or urban. Gaffron responded that <br />the property is in the LR -lA district, which is a 2 acre lakeshore zone but not provided with <br />municipal utilities. The road would be urban if considering the lakeshore district, but rural in <br />character because of the 2 acre lot size. Flint asked if the City would extend North Arm Lane in the <br />future. Gaffron responded that North Arm Lane turns into a driveway serving the property to the <br />north. There is a potential that the Armstrongs could sell or develop their property into 2 acre lots <br />which could be accessed off of North Arm Lane. <br />17 <br />i <br />