Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23, 1998 <br />( #8 - #2292 Tom Okerstrom - Continued) <br />Jabbour moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4050 per the Planning <br />Commission recommendation. Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 1, Peterson. Goetten asked that the <br />resolution reflect that no further hardcover would be allowed on the property in the <br />future. <br />( #9) #2317 KHASROW DAIVARI, 1082 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - AFTER -THE- <br />FACT VARIANCES <br />The Applicant was not present. Bressler indicated Daivari did sign the extension for the <br />application. Goetten asked how many times the Council is to table an application due to <br />the absence of the applicant, noting this has occurred in this instance already. Staff was <br />asked to inform the applicant that action must be taken on the application due to the time <br />allowed, and action will take place at the next meeting. The Council voiced frustration <br />with the applicant's absence. <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to table Application #2317. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />( #11) #2335 LAWRENCE MOLSATHER AND LINDA SALLEE, 3285 CARMAN <br />ROAD - VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4052 <br />• The applicants were present. <br />is <br />Bressler distributed pictures of the property. The proposal is to rebuild and expand the <br />existing deck on the lakeside requiring variances for structural coverage, hardcover in the <br />0 -75' lakeshore setback, lakeshore setback, and average Lakeshore setback. The Planning <br />Commission recommended approval with the condition that all plastic under landscaping <br />be removed and the flagstone walkway eliminated prior to issuance of a building permit <br />and no future variances would be granted for the property. <br />Bressler reviewed the survey and findings as indicated in the resolution draft. He <br />indicated the deck location, the roof line, and elevations. <br />Molsather indicated that the house was built in the early 1960's. The variances are <br />required due to the home being built prior to current zoning regulations. Molsather said <br />they made all attempts to meet the recommendation. <br />Jabbour pointed out that the hardcover calculations did not include the legally non- <br />conforming hardcover and no credit was allowed for that hardcover. Sallee said they <br />understood this would not be included in the calculations. <br />7 <br />