Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23, 1998 <br />( #8 - #2292 Tom Okerstrom - Continued) 4W <br />Okerstrom indicated he has spent alot of time in an attempt to comply with City <br />requirements. He feels the plan will come near to meeting the City standards. . <br />Goetten commented that the garage is not in compliance due to the large house built only <br />two years ago. Goetten said she would not support the proposal except for the need for <br />a garage in Minnesota. She has found it discouraging that the applicant is here asking for <br />this variance. Okerstrom responded that the house on the property was built on the same <br />foundation as the previous home. There had been a two car garage on the property in the <br />past. He had not been aware of the issues. It was his assumption that the old garage had <br />to be removed prior to the house being built. Okerstrom said the house would have been <br />made smaller if he had known the issues involved. <br />Bressler said Builder Inspector Bruce Vang had informed the builder that zoning issues <br />would arise if the garage was not taken into consideration when the house was built. The <br />builder evidently did not pass this information on to the applicant. Goetten noted that a <br />building permit is required for building any structure. <br />Peterson asked if the garage is comparable in size to the previous garage. Bressler was <br />unaware of the past dimensions. He explained that the Planning Commission requested a <br />reduction in the garage footprint to 22'x24' and a decrease in the height to a 10/12 pitch. <br />Jabbour was informed that the overhead storage area will be less than originally planned. <br />Okerstrom added that the pitch is in keeping with the style of the home. <br />Jabbour commented that the garage would impose upon the area around the road and <br />would not be in keeping with other garages along the road. Okerstrom said the garage <br />was smaller. Jabbour voiced concern with a garage located within 8' of the road adding <br />that the Council must protect the neighborhood. Goetten agreed that the Council's <br />efforts are towards improving the situation. <br />Peterson asked if the garage should be moved back further than 20' on the lot, Goetten <br />reminded her that this would increase hardcover. Jabbour noted that the neighboring <br />garage is within 20' of the right -of -way. <br />Goetten said the Council also needs to consider the driveway and the ability to get out <br />onto the roadway. Peterson noted that the applicant would not be able to drive out onto <br />Tonkawa. She preferred that the garage was pushed back as far as possible. Peterson <br />asked how much space was available. Bressler indicated there is currently 20' proposed <br />between the edge of the bituminous and the front slab of the garage. <br />Peterson asked if a one -car garage was considered. Goetten felt it would be <br />unreasonable to scale it back to that degree. <br />Is <br />6 <br />