My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-23-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:12:33 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:12:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23, 1998 <br />(#9 - #2317 Khasrow Daivari - Continued) <br />Daivari was asked if he would like to table the application. Daivari asked if it would <br />make a difference. Daivari said he would like to see which part was wrong and why he <br />was treated so poorly. Jabbour informed Daivari that State Statute requires that a <br />hardship be shown. Daivari said he feels he has a hardship. Jabbour noted if the <br />structure is not built to code, it cannot remain. Daivari asked for a meeting with the <br />building inspector. <br />Jabbour explained that there were two problems, one being the zoning issue and the other <br />being the building's integrity. If the building inspector finds that the porch does not have <br />the proper foundation, it must be removed. The Council is obligated to answer to the <br />zoning issue. <br />Bressler said he had spoken with the Building Inspector, Lyle Oman, who informed him <br />that his concern was with the foundation and whether frost footings were necessary. <br />Another issue was the need for a solid roof. The applicant had only screened the roof in. <br />Jabbour asked Peterson to comment from the Planning Commission meeting. Peterson <br />said, as she recalled, the Commission looked at both the issue of hardship and the <br />building integrity. <br />Daivari felt it was a matter of how it was handled. He said Van Zomeren was very • <br />helpful. He said he spoke three times with the city and issues came forward with the <br />foundation and structure. Daivari said he asked to see the pictures presented at the <br />Planning Commission but was not shown them. <br />Peterson said she recalled that the encroachment issue was the main concern and the <br />structural integrity was secondary. Daivari said he was not informed of this and believed <br />the simple issue was made into a large one. Jabbour suggested Daivari direct concerns <br />regarding staff to the City Administrator. <br />Peterson felt Daivari should be able to speak with the building inspector if he so desired. <br />Jabbour asked about the zoning issue. <br />Flint felt less time should be spent at the Council level regarding such issues and listen to <br />the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Discussion would only be a <br />rediscussion of what occurred at the Planning Commission. He suggested listening to the <br />Commission's recommendation for denial. <br />Peterson said she would not support the encroachment when the porch could be designed <br />to be less intrusive for the neighbors. Daivari said the neighbors thought the porch was a <br />good idea. Is <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.