My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-23-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:12:33 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:12:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23,1998 <br />( #7A) ORDER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHORELINE/HERITAGE <br />• SANITARY SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION NO. 4049 <br />Flint moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4049 ordering preparation of <br />plans and specifications for the project. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Moorse informed the residents that the motion allows for the City to order the plans and <br />specifications. Bids will be taken after this is completed. Final costs will be determined <br />at that time and an assessment hearing held. Jabbour noted that there is a 30 -day waiting <br />period after the assessment hearing. The residents are allowed to waive the assessment <br />hearing through signing a waiver to accelerate the process. <br />( #9) #2317 KHASROW DAIVARI, 1082 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - AFTER -THE- <br />FACT VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 4051 <br />The applicant arrived at the meeting. <br />Jabbour moved, Peterson seconded, to reconsider the motion to table the application. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Bressler reported that the application is for after -the -fact variances to allow the retention <br />and completion of a screen porch constructed over an existing deck. It was built without <br />• a permit and requires after- the -fact variances for average lakeshore setback and structural <br />coverage. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the request. <br />Bressler reviewed the findings as noted in the resolution draft. <br />Mr. Daivari felt the issue was taken personally by the City, and he felt he has been treated <br />poorly. Daivari said he did not think of the porch as a structure as there was screening <br />only. He did not think he needed a building permit and applied for the variance once he <br />was notified of the fact. He said he made a mistake but was not informed by the City <br />what should have been done. Daivari said he made the decision to remove the porch. He <br />misunderstood when the last Council meeting was and found out at the Council had made <br />their decision. <br />Jabbour informed Daivari that the Council has not made any decision. He said the State <br />Statute requires action to be taken within a 60 day time period and time was lapsing. The <br />Council could not wait until this date and required his permission to extend the time line. <br />Bressler explained that Daivari was referring to the resolution draft. Jabbour explained <br />that the resolutions are drafted based on the Planning Commission recommendations and <br />are not approved until the Council does so. <br />Daivari referenced another porch on Loma Linda that received approval. He said he had <br />asked what could be done to make everything right but was told that nothing could be <br />done. Jabbour told Daivari that the Council cannot override what the building inspector <br />determines. The porch must be constructed to universal building code. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.