My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-26-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:09:54 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:09:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />1V11' ET-E G HELL ON JANUARY 26, iyya <br />( #16 - FerndnlP Road Nnrth Prniect - Continned) <br />Jabbour clarified that based on State guidelines Plymouth is paying for 100% of the trail. <br />However, under this formula, Orono is paying $700,000 for the road, while Plymouth is <br />only paying $515,000. If the bike path is added in to the cost, Orono would pay for half <br />that cost but Piymouth would be increasing their cost by picking up ii2 of the full cost of <br />the road. With the even split in costs, Jabbour questioned asking Plymouth to pay for the <br />trail too. Flint added that all of the residents voiced support of the trail. <br />Goetten reported that she has received many calls over the years from residents of this <br />neighborhood asking for a path on the west side of the road for their use. She is <br />concerned that the trail is only for the east side. Flint said the larger portion of <br />popuiation is on the east side but the traii viii be used by aii. <br />Jabbour asked if a path can be striped on the west side on a 28' wide road. Gappa said <br />no. A 4` traii on both sides of the road wouid require 32. Gappa indicated that the <br />difference comes into play due to the curb reaction distance, which requires 2'. Kellogg <br />elaborated that the driving lane cannot be closer than 2' from the curb. <br />Kelley asked how cost sharing can be discussed without seeing the design. Jabbour <br />disagreed that the design is unknown. Kelley questioned what land is being taken on <br />both sides of the road. Jabbour felt enough information has been gathered. He noted the <br />road is staked at 36' and residents should be able to determine the change related to the <br />28' roadway. <br />Jabbour noted there were two choices for the Council to consider, the 28' MSA road or <br />the 28' repavement. He thought that the cost was the only issue to resolve, and a <br />decision is necessary in order to move forward. <br />Kelley asked if the road will be centered on the right -of -way. Jabbour said it would be <br />shifted toward the Orono side. Kellogg said the road center would be 4' into the Orono <br />or western side of the center line of the right -of -way. Kelley asked why this is occurring. <br />Kellogg said the reason is to balance the road within the right -of -way, especially with the <br />trail construction, and avoid destroying trees. The road will transition T to the east on <br />the north end of the road. The road is staked in order for the residents to get a <br />preliminary idea of where the road will be. <br />Flint asked if the road was now coming in 4' on each side with the 28' design. He was <br />informed that this is true, though the detailed layout has not yet been done. <br />Jabbour noted that the detailed drawing of the 36' width roadway was denied. He asked <br />what the cost was for the drawing. Kellogg said he believed the cost was not wasted. <br />Jabbour said the cost is wasted if the road is only repaved. <br />CJ <br />1) A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.