Laserfiche WebLink
♦ � la <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1334 - REBERS CONTINUED • <br />was brought forth, the Council was not certain as to the square <br />footage of the four lots along the northern property line. They <br />were also uncertain as to whether there was a need for additional <br />controls with the enlarged building pads. The matter was <br />referred back to the Planning Commission so that they could <br />determine potential impact of construction on the four enlarged <br />building pads. The Planning Commission recommended that the side <br />setback of the no grading /restricted development areas be <br />expanded from 30' to 40' and found no need for further controls. <br />Councilmember Goetten stated that she had no further concerns <br />regarding this application. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Nettles, to approve this item. Motion, Ayes =4, <br />Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />#1362 PAUL HAUSER <br />2801 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />RESOLUTION #2577 <br />As explained by City Administrator Bernhardson, this was a <br />request for an average lakeshore setback variance. Originally, <br />the applicants were also in need of a hardcover variance, but <br />have since revised their proposal so as to remove 700 s.f. of <br />hardcover, rather than the 417 s.f. recommended by the Planning • <br />Commission. <br />The Hausers were present for this matter and had no <br />questions or comments. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson to adopt Resolution #2577, in accordance <br />with the Planning Commission recommendations. Motion, Ayes =4, <br />Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />#1364 EDWIN GAGE <br />480 TONRAWA ROAD <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />RESOLUTION <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained that the applicant was proposing to construct a 6' wide <br />walkway through a wetland and partially within the 0 -75' zone. <br />Mr. David Stockdale, the Contractor, explained that the 6' <br />width was preferred because of the length of the walkway. It <br />would offer more stability and more room for passing. <br />Councilmember Goetten expressed her concern about approving <br />420' of hardcover within the 0 -75' zone. She felt it would set a <br />precedent to allow new hardcover in that area. She asked why it <br />would not be more practical, from a safety standpoint, to build • <br />the walkway 4' in width with a railing? Mr. Stockdale said that <br />the railings would have more of a vertical visual impact. <br />