My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1989 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
02-13-1989 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2012 11:41:28 AM
Creation date
9/5/2012 11:41:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 13, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #2576 PETERSON /STODOLA CONTINUED <br />Councilmember Nettles, to adopt Resolution #2576, denying <br />variances to Municipal Code, Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(b), as <br />amended. Motion, Ayes =4, Nays =O, Motion passed. <br />#1330 FULLERTON PROPERTIES <br />880 TOWNLINE ROAD <br />REQUEST FOR ENTRY MONUMENT <br />City Administrator BE <br />was a request for an entr3 <br />Ordinance passed in July, <br />be tabled until the Februi <br />Works Director Gerhardsoi <br />Engineer. <br />rnhardson briefly explained that this <br />monument on Townline Road. Due to an <br />1988, it is recommended that this item <br />ry 27 Council Meeting to allow Public <br />an opportunity to meet with the City <br />Mr. Joe Franks, a representative from Fullerton Properties, <br />was present and indicated that he did not object to this item <br />being tabled. However, he said that he would be unable to attend <br />the meeting of February 27th and wanted to take this opportunity <br />to present his point of view. He said that when Fullerton <br />Properties built private roads, it created a negative situation <br />for the homeowners who would live on the road. The entry <br />monumemt is proposed to give a more positive feeling to them. <br />Fullerton Properties agreed that the monument could be removed if <br />and when the road became public. <br />Councilmember Nettles asked whether the homeowner's <br />association would be financially responsible for the removal of <br />the monument? Mr. Franks replied that perhaps the amount could <br />be assessed. Nettles asked if the covenants and restrictions <br />would address that issue? Mr. Franks said that the City could <br />require that the monument be removed before the City accepted the <br />road. Councilmember Goetten questioned whether or not such a <br />provision could be included within the Resolution as part of <br />final plat approval? Mr. Franks said he would have no problem <br />with that. <br />Councilmember Goetten suggested using the criteria used for <br />the zoning ordinances pertaining to entry monuments on private <br />land for this new ordinance. City Administrator Bernhardson <br />said that he would be further investigating whether there would <br />be a need to involve the Planning Commission due to the signage <br />aspect of this. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to table this item until the February 27, <br />1989 Regular Council Meeting. Motion, Ayes =4, Nays =O, Motion <br />Passed. <br />#1334 SIDNEY REBERS <br />. HIGHWAY 12 & NORTH BROWN ROAD <br />AMENDED PRELIMINARY PLAN <br />Councilmember Goetten stated for the record the reason why <br />this matter was referred back to the Planning Commission. She <br />stated that at the December 12th Council Meeting when this matter <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.