Laserfiche WebLink
� MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> � • • Monday,February 13,2012 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. #12-3540 CHARLES TRUWITAND PAULA PICARD, 1105 FERNDALE ROAD WEST, <br /> Continued) <br /> Curtis indicated that is what the revised hardcover calculations show on the second page of Staff's report. <br /> Staff removed the portion of the driveway that only benefits the neighbor and everything that the subject <br /> property needs to access the property is included in the hardcover numbers. <br /> McMillan asked whether anyone has any issues with the patio being converted into a deck. <br /> Bremer and Printup indicated they do not. <br /> Rahn stated as it relates to the driveway, in his view the circular driveway is excessive and that he is not <br /> in support of the turnaround. Rahn commented there might be more headlight issues with the tear drop. <br /> Rahn stated he is not sure why the City Council would allow the blue driveway area since it appears the <br /> applicants have a plenty wide turnaround without the blue area. <br /> Truwit indicated the blue currently exists and that it would be removed with the addition of the <br /> turnaround. <br /> Rahn stated he would go with Staff's recommendation and pointed out that it is a lot more house than <br /> what was there before and that in his opinion it would have an impact on the character of the <br /> neighborhood. Rahn commented that he has received complaints from other citizens about ramblers <br /> being changed to two-story residences. <br /> Rahn stated as it relates to driveways in general,the City Council gets very detailed on how wide <br /> driveways can be, along with turnarounds. Rahn stated it appears that there would be plenty of room to <br /> turn a car around and asked whether the engineer agrees with that assessment. <br /> Curtis indicated he does. <br /> Rahn stated if the applicant would like to rearrange the driveway and perhaps remove a third garage stall, <br /> the application can be tabled for redesign. <br /> Truwit indicated he did remove some of the existing hardcover and that he is not interested in redesigning <br /> his plans. Truwit noted this is the last one-story house in the neighborhood and that the other homes have <br /> already been converted or have been approved for redesign. Truwit stated the character of the <br /> neighborhood has already changed and that the current house is not livable the way it is. <br /> McMillan commented the applicant has a right to construct a second story but that it will have some <br /> impact to the neighboring property. As it relates to the driveway, in an ideal world without the need to <br /> limit hardcover, it would be elegant. McMillan stated in her view the applicant does have enough room to <br /> back cars in and out of the driveway. McMillan stated she understands why the applicant would like that <br /> amenity but that in her opinion there are already concessions being made with the location of the house. <br /> Truwit stated the current house is an eyesore and that they are proposing a solution. Truwit stated he has <br /> given the City Council his rationale for the turnaround and that he would like to proceed forward with the <br /> rest of the house. <br /> Franchot asked which corner the conservatory would be located on. <br /> Page 13 of 22 <br />