My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
06-13-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 4:48:22 PM
Creation date
8/21/2012 4:48:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'R <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 13, 1988 <br />WOODHILL <br />AVENUE CONTINUED <br />Orchard Road and felt the road improvement would be of <br />no benefit to him and should not have to share in the <br />costs for the improvement. <br />There were no other comments from the public and the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Sime, that the Council approved the <br />}. <br />project for Woodhill Avenue to be undertaken; and accept <br />the bid. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmembers <br />Goetten and Peterson voted nay. Motion tied::. <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />+ <br />Councilmember Sime, to table the matter until the July <br />11, 1988 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. <br />Councilmember Peterson voted nay. Motion carried. <br />Councilmember Sime noted the improbability of getting a <br />`± <br />4/5's vote on this issue at the July 11th meeting. <br />Therefore, he recommended that the matter be held in <br />abeyance until the July 25th meeting. <br />• <br />Council felt that tabling the matter further would not <br />necessarily guarantee obtaining a 4/5's vote. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson also noted that the bids <br />would expire by the July 25th meeting. <br />Councilmember Goetten noted the history of two nay votes <br />throughout this-issue and felt this outcome should have <br />been anticipated. <br />•, <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated it was his <br />understanding that the opposition was mainly. on the <br />assessment to the abutting property owners and not <br />necessarily against the project being undertaken. <br />Councilmember Peterson asked how wide Woodhill Avenue <br />currently is and technically what width should the road <br />be? <br />.a <br />h <br />:.S <br />City Engineer Cook stated that the road is currently <br />16' or 18' wide. The road should be at least 20' wide, <br />but it is recommended to build roads 24' wide because <br />of the tendancy for the side of the pavement breaking <br />up. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.