Laserfiche WebLink
. . __. , �L�C� (�C.. Ff' d'i✓�l/f(,(� ��,� - <br /> Jan. 25, 1999 .�� <br /> Mr. Bruce Vang .- � ,� 1��� <br /> Field Inspector ' <br /> City of Orono � ��� '��•�'"� <br /> 27�0 Kelley Parkway <br /> Orono, Mn. 55356 <br /> Dear Mr. Van�, <br /> I have just returned from vacation time spent out of town and am in <br /> receipt of your Dec. 28, 1998 letter regarding your response to my Dec. 21, <br /> 1998 request for an e�tension of land alteration permit number 01040� <br /> issued on June 23, 1998. <br /> I have to say I am disappoiiited by ti'our reponse. My request was for a <br /> simple el�tension of the O 10�0� permit wliich had alread_y been granted to <br /> me specifically to complete work on shoreline property o�vned by my family. <br /> I provided the required written request to your office before the expiration <br /> date of permit 010404 as is required by your procedural rules. In that <br /> request, I provided an explanation of what we are doing, what we �vish to <br /> accomplish, and why we have been tinable to complete the work within the <br /> initial time period the permit provided. I eYplained our reasons for doing the <br /> �vork on Nov. 30, 1998 which would ha��e been well before the eYpiration <br /> date of permit 010404. I also explaitied that we have been denied the ability <br /> to complete the ���ork before the expiration date. <br /> As you are well aware, on Nov. 30, 1998 you amved almost immediately <br /> after we began work that morning and after a lengthy discussion with you <br /> and Mr. James Hafner, of the MCWD, whom you had telephoned and <br /> requested to join us, you and Mr. Hafner insisted that we stop work <br /> immediately at that time and determine whether any� additional permits <br /> would be required by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resuurces or the <br /> Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. I felt that fiirther discussion at that <br /> time was not appropriate as I had already had a number of�i-orkmen <br /> patiently waiting at ri��o work sites and large equipment sitting idle at both <br /> sites for, as I recall, nearly an hour while discussing the situation with you <br /> and Mr. Hafner and a���aitin� Mr. Hafner's arrival at our lakeshore site. As <br /> you will recall, there ���as some variance of opinion as to what each of us, <br /> including you and Mr. Hafner, felt could and should be done immediately <br /> �.ti�ithout the need for any additional permit. Both you and Mr. Hafner also <br /> stated you felt input from the MDNR �vould be helpfiil in deterniining what <br /> P, I <br />