Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 <br />ep NING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #1 <br />RESOLUTION #2131 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the amendment <br />to amend the M.U.S.A. Boundaries original defined and <br />approved in 1979 -1980. This amendment includes areas <br />that have been sewered since the Comprehensive <br />Management Plan was adopted together with allowing the <br />sewering of the Fulmer property located at Highway 12 <br />and the Burlington Railroad tracks and Stubbs Bay Road, <br />which was previously not sewered. The Metropolitan <br />Council approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at <br />their February 12, 1987 meeting. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, that the Orono City Council <br />adopt Resolution #2131 approving Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment #1. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - <br />NON- RENTAL GUEST HOUSE <br />LIQUOR STORE <br />PUBLIC STRUCTURES <br />ORDINANCE NO. 29 SECOND SERIES <br />City Administrator explained that this amendment was <br />reviewed and passed with a 3 -1 vote at the February 9th <br />meeting however ordinance amendments require a 4 /5ths <br />majority vote. He noted one additional change in the <br />language regarding public service structures. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that George Rovegno, <br />2010 Shoreline Drive, wanted it conveyed to the Council <br />that he felt it was important to have a second public <br />hearing involving any design changes of public <br />structures <br />It was explained that amendments to approved plans <br />involving design and /or placement of public structures <br />will require written notice by the City to all affected <br />property owners prior to the formal adoption of the <br />amended plans by the Council, thereby giving the <br />affected public the opportunity to appear before the <br />Council before final approval of the change. <br />Councilmember Callahan recommended that a time limit for <br />the required written notice be incorporated, suggesting <br />14 days. <br />3 <br />