My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-00698 (add./remod./repair)
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Carman Street
>
2413 Carman Street - 20-117-23-12-0011
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2016-00698 (add./remod./repair)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:49:02 PM
Creation date
9/7/2016 9:02:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2413
Street Name
Carman
Street Type
Street
Address
2413 Carman Street
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
2011723120011
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
g-��o <br /> CITY OF ORONO <br /> y �, Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600 <br /> F <br /> G� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616 <br /> l,y �, Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us <br /> kEsxo� <br /> June 28, 2016 <br /> Dusty Howley <br /> Pro Style Carpentry <br /> 3947 Hubbard Avenue N <br /> Robbinsdale, MN 55422 <br /> Re: Building Permit Application#2016-00698 <br /> 2413 Carman Street <br /> On June 17, 2016 the City received a building permit app�ication for second story addition, new stoop, and porch <br /> addition to the home as well as a garage expansion. Staff conducted a preliminary review based on the information <br /> provided and requests the following items be submitted or revised in order for your application to be considered <br /> complete and for the plan review to continue: <br /> 1. Certificate of Survey. Please Note: The survey currently does not depict the correct principal structure <br /> setbacks for the LR-1C district. According to the City Code definitions,the "front" of a corner lot is defined as <br /> the shorter of the two frontage sides.The Carman Street frontage is 150.5'and the Shoreline Drive frontage is <br /> 140.5.' Shoreline Drive is the front for setback purposes. Principal structure setbacks for LR-1C are as follows: <br /> 30 feet from the front (Shoreline Drive); 30 feet from the rear or south side (side opposite the front); 15 feet <br /> from the side street (Carman Street); and 10 feet from the west (interior) side. While all proposed additions <br /> to the home meet the principal structure setbacks from propertv lines the survev should be revised to reflect <br /> the appropriate setback. <br /> 2. Proposed Porch/Addition. According to City Code Section 78-1438, a 10 foot separation is required between <br /> principal and accessory buildings. After review,it appears the proposed porch addition is situated±9 feet from <br /> the garage. The porch must be revised to meet the 10-foot separation/setback or a variance must be approved <br /> by the Citv Council. <br /> 3. Stoop. The plans reflect a change in the location of the front entrance/new stoop. Please provide clarification <br /> re�ardin�the potential chan�e in the sidewalk location <br /> 4. Detached Garage:OAS and Plumbing. The detached garage exists as a 1,014 square foot structure;according <br /> to City Code Section 78-1434, a structure exceeding 1,000 square feet in footprint area is defined as an <br /> Oversized Accessory Structure (or OAS). Since the garage was constructed in 1975 and pre-dates the adoption <br /> of City Code Section 78-1434, it is considered a legal, nonconforming structure. A legal, non-conforming <br /> structure may be rebuilt in-kind (same or smaller footprint, height,volume,etc.). Buildings defined as an OAS <br /> have to meet special setbacks as outlined in the enclosed code. The existin��ara�e does not meet the required <br /> 30-foot setbacks from the side and rear lot lines. It appears from the submitted building plans an expansion of <br /> the upper floor and/or roof is proposed within the 30-foot setbacks. Because the expansions proposed do not <br /> meet the repuired OAS setbacks the expansions cannot be approved administrativelv bv staff a variance is <br /> necessarv. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.