Laserfiche WebLink
11-3531 <br /> 9 January 2012 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> 1) Compliance with the City Engineer's recommendations. The City Engineer recommended the <br /> �; foll.owing: . � <br /> ' � � ` 'a)� The city should request drainage and utility easements 5-feet wide along all interior lot lines and <br /> ' ` lot lines adjacent to platted property. Ten foot wide easements should be shown along exterior <br /> lot lines adjacent to unplatted properties. <br /> U date: The applicants have provided an updated survey which shows the requested utility and <br /> drainage easements. <br /> b) The plan shows a wetland along the north lot line and Wolverton Place. The city wetland map <br /> shows a Manage 2 wetland along the north lot line and no record of the roadside wetland. The <br /> north wetland needs to be buffered according to city ordinance. If the wetland along the road is <br /> incidental according to the watershed, no buffers would be required. If the roadside wetland is <br /> not incidental,the wetland must be typed using MnRAM to determine the buffer width. <br /> Update: The survey has been revised to reflect the appropriate buffer and setback around the <br /> northerly wetland. The southerly wetland along the road has been determined by rhe MCWD to <br /> be an incidental wetland and therefore not subject to WCA requirements. The area of the <br /> southerly wetland is considered as part of the dry, buildable Iand for the purpose of the . <br /> subdivision. �� <br /> c) Grading associated with the proposed driveway should be included in the plans.We recommend <br /> at least 50 feet of no steeper than 2% grade at the roadway and no steeper than 10�o for the <br /> remainder ofthe driveway. <br /> . Update: The grading plan was submitted and has been deemed acceptable. The grading plan <br /> should be shown on the certificate of survey. <br /> 2) Submittal of MCWD approved wetland delineations and functional assessment for all wetlands on <br /> the property; - <br /> Update: See#16 above. This requirement has been met. <br /> 3) Confirmation that the property contains a total of 10.0 dry, buildable acres; <br /> Update: See update within#16 above. The No-Loss decision relating to the southerly wetland allows <br /> the area to be included in the dry, buildable acreage. Based on the No-Loss decision, the property <br /> totals 10.05 dry, buildable acres this requirement has been satisfied(proposed Tract A contains 5.00 <br /> dry acres and proposed Tract 8 contains 5.05 acresJ. <br /> 4) Submittal of a conservation design plan which meets the requirements of the Conservation Design <br /> regulations for review,approval and implementation; <br /> Update:the applicant's conservation design plan has been received and is attached as Exhibits D& E. <br /> 5) Submittal of a revised subdivision survey indicating standard perimeter drainage and utility <br /> easements as well as conservation, flowage and drainage easements over all wetlands and <br /> wetland buffers on the property. Additionally, a 10' trail easement should be shown concurrent <br /> with the requested perimeter D/U easement along McCulley Road. . <br />