My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/21/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
02/21/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 3:21:06 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 3:21:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 21,2012 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gozola noted the City has not received any comments from the adjoining property owners. The City <br /> Engineer has reviewed the plans and did not have any recommended changes. Staffs recommended <br /> conditions are contained on Pages 9 and 10 of the report. <br /> Thiesse asked if the turnaround is eight feet wide. <br /> Gozola indicated it is eight feet wide. <br /> Levang asked why the apron is as wide as it is. <br /> Gozola stated it is that width to accommodate the garage doors. <br /> Schoenzeit commented the elimination of the curb cut on the county road is a positive. <br /> Paggen stated he does not have anything to add to Staffs report. <br /> Chair Schoenzeit opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Schoenzeit closed the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. <br /> Levang and Schwingler indicated they are not in favor of removing the turnaround. <br /> Schoenzeit stated it appears the hardcover numbers have been clarified. <br /> Landgraver asked whether there was an issue with the patio that was raised at the last Planning <br /> Commission meeting. <br /> Schoenzeit asked whether the patio would remain. <br /> Gozola indicated the patio would remain. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if the dotted line depicts the average lakeshore setback. <br /> Gozola indicated it does, and in order for that to be a deck, it would need to be 30 inches or lower. <br /> Leskinen asked what the applicant is proposing for that area. <br /> Gozola stated they have not made that determination yet, and if it is above the 30 inches,they would need <br /> to come back before the Planning Commission. <br /> Landgraver commented he also feels the elimination of the driveway accessing onto the county road is a <br /> positive. <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.