My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/21/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
02/21/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 3:21:06 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 3:21:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 21,2012 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gozola stated the subject property is located in the southwestern corner of the community near Lakeshore <br /> Drive and south of Baldur Park Road. There are two portions of the properly that are located in the 0-75 <br /> foot zone,with the remainder of the property being located in the 75-250 foot zone. <br /> Gozola displayed an aerial photograph of the area depicting the location of the house and the driveway. <br /> Gozola noted the path that was shown on the survey has been removed. <br /> Gozola stated the area in red is the existing home and driveway. The applicant is proposing to place a <br /> major addition on the existing legal nonconforming home. The proposed addition would expand living <br /> area within the dwelling and would include an attached two-car garage. The existing driveway and entry <br /> point onto County Road 51 would be eliminated in favor of a new driveway with an entry point on Baldur <br /> Park Road. In addition,a small area of patio has been proposed. It could also serve as a deck provided it <br /> is under 30 inches. <br /> The applicant has addressed all issues raised by Staff and Staff is comfortable with the hardcover numbers <br /> presented. The applicant is requesting a 0-75 foot zone hardcover variance to allow 5.4 percent hardcover <br /> where 0 percent currently exists and 0 percent is normally allowed except for driveways, stairways, lifts, <br /> landings, and lockboxes; and a 75-250 foot zone hardcover variance to allow 36.4 percent hardcover <br /> where 27.4 percent currently exists and 25 percent is normally allowed. Both variances requested are to <br /> accommodate construction of additions to the existing home on the property and relocation of the <br /> driveway. Staff believes this proposal can meet all requirements for a variance as outlined in the code <br /> provided the conditions outlined in Staffs report are met. <br /> Gozola noted the second variance is required due to the driveway being wider than eight feet and also <br /> being located in the 0-75 foot zone. With regards to structural coverage,the applicants are currently <br /> conforming at 8.6 percent. With the proposed additions, structural coverage will be at 13.85 percent. <br /> Staff's analysis of the requests is outlined on Pages 4 through 8 of Staff's report. Staff believes that each <br /> request is reasonable since the overall structure size is well within the City's requirements and the garage <br /> is logically placed given the constraints of the lot. The driveway is now accessing Baldur Park Road <br /> rather than the county road. <br /> As part of Staffs approval recommendation,there was some potential hardcover identified that could be <br /> reduced. The driveway apron could be reduced from 18 feet down to 15 feet,which is the minimum <br /> required by code. The second option to reduce hardcover would be to consider removal of the <br /> turnaround. The third option would be to reduce the overall width of this driveway from 12 feet down to <br /> 8 feet. The final option is the Planning Commission could require realignment of the driveway to <br /> meander around the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> Gozola stated if the Planning Commission requires removal of the turnaround,he would not recommend <br /> implementing options three or four since you would be requiring a driver to back up in the driveway <br /> approximately 100 feet to access Baldur Park Road. If the turnaround should remain,options three and <br /> four are reasonable. Implementing option four raises some concerns. Due to the area being very flat, if <br /> the driveway is reduced to eight feet,and because there is no parking on North Shore Drive,people will <br /> stack up in the driveway and will need to go in reverse to access the road. With a meandering driveway, <br /> they will likely drive off the driveway,and if that occurs often enough,a compacted path would develop <br /> in the grassy area. Gozola stated that is a good argument to make that the straight driveway configuration <br /> is sensible. <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.