Laserfiche WebLink
CGP Reixie�v;2735 6l"�r.�.zcrt�a 13nrrlcirc�rcl[I 1-353UJ <br /> PIu�lniu,��CarunissiorrRep�ii•t; 11-31-11 • � <br /> (cont). e) The open ozitdoor storage czrea shall not be a�sed for storage of <br /> hcczardoais li yzcids, solids, gases, or wastes. <br /> • As a condition of the permit, staff would suggest these substances be <br /> prohibited from outdoor storage areas. Standard met. <br /> fl The property owner shall keep c�ll oactdoor storage areas free of reficse, <br /> trash, debris, weeds, and waste fill. <br /> • As a condition of the permit, staff would suggest the applicant be <br /> held to these standards. Standard met. <br /> (4) No depreciation in value. The proposed z�se will not tend to or actasally depreciate <br /> the area in which it is proposed. <br /> • The proposed site improvements and full use of the building should tend to <br /> increase surrounding property values. With all proposed conditions met, we <br /> find no reason to believe that property values will depreciate. Criteria met. <br /> (5) Nuisance. Nuisance charczcteristics generated by the use will not have an adverse <br /> effect upon existing and ficture development in adjacent areas. � ` <br /> • Conditions proposed under other review criteria, if adhered to, should <br /> mitigate any potential adverse effects on neighboring properties. Criteria <br /> met. <br /> (6) Economic return. The a�se will provide czn economic Yetccrn to the commz�nity and <br /> be commensurate with other inda�strial t�ses for which the property could feasibly <br /> be z�sed. In considering the economic reta�rn to the city, the planning comnzission <br /> and city council may give weight to the sociological impact of proposed z�se, both <br /> positive c�nd negative. <br /> • All of the uses proposed by the applicant are anticipated uses within the <br /> industrial zoning district. According to the applicant,their market studies <br /> have shown a demand for this type of storage in the area, and they do not <br /> anticipate having any negative effect on a similar operation currently located <br /> in Long Lake. Criteria met. <br /> General CUP Review Criteria: <br /> (7) Consistent with the commacnity management plc�n; <br /> • The proposed use is both anticipated and supported by the comprehensive <br /> plan. Criteria met. <br /> U:;C'!'I'/fs,51UKUrV(T/,a��d Cis�;CL�Ps�272i�Yay�ata Boulerm�d_lfrer�+C'on�panies;Kep--?735 l6aycata Botrl�i�nrr!_h'l:\'AL fli�ort_ll-3l-I Lrloc_�� <br /> Pa�e 6 <br />