My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-19-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 4:34:27 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 4:34:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 15,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Schoenzeit asked why the Planning Commission would approve something in front of a lakeshore <br /> setback. <br /> Curtis stated they are not encroaching further into the average lakeshore setback but are expanding within <br /> the average lakeshore setback. Curtis displayed the average lakeshore setback line. Curtis stated the <br /> proposal will have no impact on the view of the lake for the property to the west or to the east. <br /> Staff does not have the ability to grant the buildi.ng permit because of the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> There is a provision in the Code to allow Staff to administratively approve the variance only in cases <br /> where the average lakeshore setback cannot be met. Planning Staff does not have the authority to make <br /> that administrative decision when the average lakeshore can be met. <br /> Schoenzeit asked whether this property could be subdivided further. <br /> Curtis indicated it can be. <br /> Thiesse noted the average setback was established by the house on the point. <br /> Landgraver asked if the pool is going to be eliminated and will no longer be hazdcover. <br /> David Steingas noted it is not in his application to remove the pool. <br /> Curtis asked if the pool is included in the hardcover calculations. Curtis noted the hazdcover calculation <br /> does say to remove pool and apron,which would subtract 2100 square feet. <br /> Steingas indicated he does not want removal of the pool as a requirement because it will not be removed <br /> at this stage of the game. • <br /> Leskinen asked whether that has any bearing on this application. <br /> Curtis indicated it does not and that she has no concerns about this proposal whatsoever. <br /> Chair Schoenzeit opened the public hearing at 9:38 p.m. <br /> � There were no public comments regardi.ng this application. <br /> Chair Schoenzeit closed the public hearing at 9:38 p.m. <br /> Thiesse moved,Leskinen seconded,to recommend approval of Application#11-3522, Steiner& <br /> Koppleman,LLC,on behalf of Nancy Bigos,3350 Fox Sireet,granting of an average lakeshore <br /> setback variance subject to the recommendations of Staff. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> � Curtis requested the hazdcover numbers be upda.ted prior to the City Council meeting. " <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION COMI��NTS <br /> 8. REPORT OF PLANNING CONIlVIISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING CITY <br /> COUNCIL MEETINGS ON JULY 25,2011,AND AUGUST 8,2011 � <br /> Page <br /> 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.