My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
02-22-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:39:06 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:38:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� , <br /> FILE#11-3498 <br /> 7 February 2011 <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br /> � �' Maximum Hard '° ' -� Maximum Floor -' <br /> Comprehensiue Plann � Site Ha'rd x <br /> ,t.. ^; , ' Surface �o � Area Ratio Srte FAR ; ;. <br /> Des�gnat�on Covera e % Surface / � FAR * - <br /> s - <br /> High density ' ;. '= ' ' _ " ;, ��: <br /> �residenfial (in excess� 50 13% - 1.0 0.1 :' , <br /> of`6:0`units�`er acre. } <br /> *FAR = Total Building Floor Area/Total Lot Area <br /> Heiqht limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a <br /> building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. No mansard or flat roofed multiple-family building will <br /> be allowed. The currently proposed building is a slightly different design than what was <br /> previously proposed. At 25-feet, the overall defined height meets the 30-foot height limitation. <br /> Private recreational area. Each RPUD development shall provide a minimum of ten percent of <br /> the gross proj�ct area in private recreational uses for project residents. Such area shall be for <br /> active or passive recreational uses suited to the needs of the residents of the project, including <br /> swimming pools, trails, nature areas, picnic areas, tot lots and saunas. Private recreational area <br /> requirements are in addition to the standard park dedication requirements. The site offers a <br /> great deal of open space or natural area. There are 3.8 acres of wetland and over 5 acres of <br /> usable, open space including outdoor patios. The proposal meets the RPUD private <br /> recreational area requirement. <br /> Sianaqe. Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted in a sign plan approved by the <br /> City and shall be regulated by permanent covenants. Any proposed monument and wall signage <br /> will be required to meet City Code signage requirements. The right-of-way is irregularly wide in <br /> this area. The landscape plans show a monument sign just outside the property boundary along <br /> the driveway and within the right-of-way. The developer must show that Hennepin County or <br /> MNDoT (depending on jurisdiction) has granted approval for this location. An alternate location <br /> has also been shown within the property at the northeasternmost point along Wayzata <br /> Boulevard (shown on plan sheet C2.2 dated 2/3/11). <br /> Landscapinq, screeninq and bufferinq. The RPUD minimum landscaping requirement states <br /> that all open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives, <br /> trails or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of deciduous and coniferous species, <br /> including overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials <br /> according to the RPUD code section 78-626(14)(b)(1). <br /> The site perimeter is 3,292 linear feet. The building footprint is 24,500 square feet (without the <br /> canopy). According to the applicant's plan they have used a perimeter based on the developed <br /> portion of the site rather than the entire property resulting in a lower number of trees required. <br /> The plan should be revised to address the number of trees as required by code. <br /> The plan as proposed is short 24 deciduous and 10 coniferous trees. The plans exceed the <br /> required number of shrubs considerably (by 294 shrubs) but the excess of shrubs does not <br /> offset the required trees. The plan should also identify all of the healthy trees to be removed <br /> from the site that are over 6-inches in diameter. The applicant has been asked for this <br /> information and additional detail in the landscape plans. The revised plans should be received, <br /> reviewed and approved by staff prior to the City Council meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.