My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
02-22-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:39:06 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:38:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � � � <br /> CMP Par.t 3B. Land Use Plan <br /> .� � �-� <br /> � Basis for Amendment. .The 2000-2020 CMP indicates that to more closely approach the development <br /> 4density goals established by Metropolitan Council, Orono has defined certain areas of the City where <br /> • conversion from planned Rural densities to planned Urban densities is appropriate. These aze areas where <br /> provision of urban services can be efficient,cost-effective, and have the least negative impacts on the City's <br /> environmental goals and on surrounding development. In defining where urban areas should be located,the <br /> City considers proximity to existing higher density development;proximity to existing municipal sewer lines <br /> with available capacity;proximity to existing urban services;adjacency to existing transportation corridors; <br /> and location high in the watershed to limit stormwater impacts. ' . <br /> � <br /> � Parcel Group 5 was not identified for change from Rural to Urban in the 2000-2020 CMP. Further, this <br /> 2008-2030 CMP establishes a number of policies which generally do not support the conversion of Rural <br /> land to LTrban status. However,certain factors that suggest such a change is appropriate for PGS include: , � <br /> 1. The pcoperty is essentially an "orphan", with relatively little relationship to the development that ' <br /> surrounds it,i.e.it is surrounded on three sides by transportation corridors(Old 12,New 12,Luce Line <br /> Trail);it is topographically disconnected from the primarily single family residential uses to the north; <br /> and it abuts a cemetery on the south. This lack of connectivity to surrounding residential areas makes <br /> use of the site for a"family friendly"neighborhood unattractive and poorly mazketable at best. . ' <br /> 2. The potentiai for non-residential institutional,public or private uses for the site under the current Land <br /> . Use Plan and low-density zoning is limited by the size of the site,and vehicular access limitations. <br /> a- 3. Vehiculaz access to the site has limitations due to existing and future expected traffic patterns and <br /> adjacent roadway configurations,suggesting that a low intensity residential use should be favored,over <br /> potentially higher-intensity uses that might be available via a conditional use permit. � • <br /> 4. The property is at a location•lughly visible to traffic entering Orono from the east. Development at tlus ��'�;;. <br /> � site might be considered as a`main entrance' to Orono,and as such will inherently set a tone as to the � <br /> . character of the City,and therefore a visually low-intensity use of the site should be strived for. � <br /> 5. The property abuts the Luc�Line Trail,which as it traverses Orono has a completely.different feel than <br /> it does in Plymouth to the east; a rural feel rather than a suburban feel. Development of a 50 unit <br /> residential building rather than 9 individual buildings is anticipated to result in a more compact, <br /> centered footprint, not as spread out as the previously approved 9 single family homes. This has a <br /> potential to then retain more of the long views to the southwest enjoyed by trail users,given that those <br /> views are now of a freeway and railroad corridor. Due to the trail crossing of the freeway immediately <br /> west of the properly,this is one of the very few locations in Orono traversed by the trail where denser <br /> development might not seem out of place. <br /> 6. Residential development at a density of 2 or more units per dry buildable acre would be inconsistent with � <br /> existing and expected residential development surrounding the property. While the properiy in Long ' <br /> Lake to the north is zoned to allow up to 4 units per acre,it has developed in the past with a wide range <br /> of lot sizes and at a substantially lower density than it is zoned for.The above factors suggest that this. <br /> location lends itself to a low-intensity,low-pro�ile multi-family use such as senior assisted living. The <br /> traffic generated by this use would be Iimited, and the profile of the residents wouid not require <br /> immediate adjacency to most urban amenities. Therefore,development of such a use at a density of up <br /> to 10-15 dwelling units per acre would be appropriate for the site. <br /> . Planned Development Parameters � , ' <br /> Land Use Plan Amendment-2009 <br /> � In addition to`the permitted, conditional and accesso.ry uses allowed wittun the RR-1B zoning district,this <br /> amendment allows for residential development of Parcel Group 5 at High Density(10-15 units per net acre <br /> exclusive of wetlands and required wetland buffers).Based on the net area being 5.9 acres,this would allow <br /> a minimum of 59 units. The following parameters shall be adhered to for any residential development of <br /> PG5 at a density greater than 0.5 units per net dry buildable acre of land: ` <br /> � <br /> . C-.. <br /> .�_. <br /> City of Orono Community Management Plan 2008-2030 Page 3B-36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.