Laserfiche WebLink
1 1 <br /> FILE#11-3498 <br /> 7 February 2011 <br /> . Page 10 of 10 <br /> Park Dedication. The developer shall pay the standard park dedication fee in lieu of land <br /> dedication based on .the value of 8% of the land with a minimum residential park fee of $3250 <br /> per dwelling unit. The developer is proposing 63 total units — 33 assisted living; 11 enhanced <br /> assisted living; and 19 memory care units. Assuming the estimated market�value of$1,276,000 <br /> from Hennepin County tax records, the minimum fee would apply. Applying the minimum <br /> residential park fee, and removing only the memory care units, would result in a park fee of <br /> $3250 x 44 units = $143,000. This amount is an increase from the Concept Plan approval due <br /> to the addition of units. <br /> Sewer and Water Connection CharAes. There are no City of Orono sewer and water connection <br /> charges due because the property has been assessed for sewer and water installation. <br /> However, the developer shall be responsible for connection charges imposed on the City of <br /> Orono or on the developer by the City of Wayzata for connection to their systems. MCES <br /> Sewer Availability Charges will be collected with the building permit for the property. <br /> Prior to final development approval by the City Council the developer will have paid all required <br /> fees associated with the Master Development Plan. Fees to be paid: Storm Water & Drainage <br /> Trunk Fee = $72,250; and Park Dedication Fee = $143,000. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Orono's RPUD/rezoning review process is outlined within City Code section 78-627 stipulating <br /> first a concept plan review by the Planning Commission and Council and requiring very basic <br /> information from the applicant. The intent of this part of the process is similar to a subdivision <br /> sketch plan where only guidance is given. The master development plan review is, by code, the <br /> official review, public hearing, and final approval step. However historically we have operated <br /> under a modified process in order to offer more concrete direction to applicant at the preliminary <br /> stage, adopt a concept plan approval resolution which formalizes the direction given and <br /> approvals to be granted in the master development plan approval stage. The process followed <br /> for this application was/is consistent with this modified process. The applicant (Welsh/Ecumen) <br /> submitted plans with greater detail, Planning Commission held a public hearing and the Council <br /> granted (preliminary) concept plan approval. A comprehensive review began at the concept <br /> stage and will continue with the Kraus-Anderson/Ebenezer application for the master <br /> development plan stage. <br /> The process remaining includes the Planning Commission's final review of the information <br /> provided against the criteria provided within the staff report and the Concept Plan approval <br /> resolution and to hold the public hearing in order to take any further public input. As part of the <br /> review process the Planning Commission should review the portions of the application that are <br /> complete, identify the items still missing, give the applicant direction on specific action items and <br /> move the application forward to the Council. <br /> Action Reauested <br /> Planning Commission should forward the application to the City Council with a recommendation <br /> for approval. Direct the applicant to resolve the outstanding or unresolved items prior to the <br /> Council's review. <br /> � <br />