Laserfiche WebLink
�°�o <br /> _ � � C ITY OF �RONC� <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> a <br /> �`� G~� b 5- ? 9 <br /> t'�xFSHo�� N O. <br /> WHEREAS, on May 9 S, 2015, the Planning Commission's recommendations were based on <br /> the following findings. <br /> PLi4NNtNG COMMISSION FINDINGS <br /> Regardtng the addrtlons and modiflcx�tions to the existing home: <br /> 1) The proposed one-story additions or mod'�'ic,�at�ons to the home will be low profile, wil! not <br /> be visible from the lake, and will not adversely Impact exist�ng lake views enjoyed by <br /> adjacent laiteshare properties. <br /> 2} The variance to allow additions and modifications to the home withir� the 90p-#oot lake <br /> ss#back wiU alleviate a practicaf difficult�, Inherent to the IocatEon of the existing home on <br /> the Property and not created by the AppEicants. <br /> 3j The Applicants' proposai to construc# addl�or�s and make mod�ications to the existing <br /> home results fn 28,909 square fest of ha�cover or 11.1% where 25� is the maximum <br /> Permitted by cflde; the Property exceeds 2.0 acres therefore structura! c�����e <br /> limitations do not apply. <br /> 4} The proposed addit�ons to the home are not out of character with the nelghborhooci and <br /> wil! meet side and rea�setbacks. <br /> Regardfng tha in-ground poo(: <br /> 5) The variance to plave hardcover and structure within the 75-foot setback limits <br /> opportuni�y for stormweter infiltration and is not in F►armony with the genera� intent and <br /> purpose of the Ordinanoe. <br /> 6) The varRance to construct an in-ground pool consisfing of structure and hardcover wfthin <br /> 75 feet of the OHWL is int�nsistent v►rith the camprehensive plan. <br /> 7) The appltqnt has no#establlshed that there are practicsl dit�iculties. <br /> 8) The variance #o allow an ln-ground pool to be constructed within 75 feet of the OHWL is <br /> inconsisten# wifh the majority of the large lot propertiss in Orono on Long Lake and will <br /> alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> 9} The Applicants have sufficient attemate loca�fans to on the Propeny � ��8�� a <br /> conforming in-ground pool; the granting of the varianoe to permit an in-ground paol to be <br /> constructed withln the 75 foot setback is no# necessary for the �resenration and <br /> enjayment of a substantisl property right of the Applicants. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />