Laserfiche WebLink
. -�-��o � . <br /> � � � CITY C)F ORONO <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �� G�� <br /> ���ESH��� N�. _S.1 5'.'L__ <br /> A RESOLUTION <br /> GRAN'TING SETBACK VARiANCES <br /> FROM ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> SECTIQNS 78-1279 <br /> AND DENYING VARIANCE FROM <br /> ORONO MUNlCIPAL CODE SECTIONS 78-1279 and 76-lggp <br /> FI�E N0. 15-3738 <br /> WHEREAS, John Bowisby and Cyndy Bawisby, a mar�ied cQUple, <br /> (hereinafter "Applicants'°) are the owners of the property located at 1025 Spring Hill Rosd <br /> with#n the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") an� iegally descr{bed as attached in Exhibit A <br /> (hereinafter"the Property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, ihe Appticants have made applicatlon to the City for a varianrre <br /> from Orono City Code Section 78-9279 ta permit construction of additlons and modifications <br /> to the horne, and an in-ground pooi ahead of the average takeshore setback iine; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Appticants have made appficetion to the City for variances <br /> from Orona City Code Sectlon 78-1279 to permit construction of an addltion toward the lake <br /> on #he east side of tl�e home 84 fee#from#he OHWL; and an in-ground pool 80 feet from the <br /> OHVNL where a 100-foot se#badc is required; and <br /> VYHEREAS, the Applicants have rnade applicetion ta fhe City for a variance <br /> from Orono City Code Section T8-1680 to permit constn�c#ion of in-graund pool consls#ing of <br /> hardcover and structure within 60 feet of the OHWL where structure and hardcover are rrot <br /> permitted within 75 feet of the OHWL; <br /> WHEREAS, after due published notice and malled notice in accordanoe with <br /> Minnesota Statutes and the Oror�o, Minnesota, City Code, the prono planning Commission <br /> held a public hesring on May 18, 2015, at which times all persons desfring to be heard <br /> concernirig #fiis application were given the opportunity to speaic t�eon. <br /> WHEREAS, The Planning Commission reviewed #his application on May 18, <br /> 2015, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the lake setback and <br /> average lakeshore setback to permit tha addifions snd moci�cations to the lake side af fhe <br /> home; and ta deny the average lakeshflre setback, lake se#back and ha,rdcover variances <br /> relating to the proposed pool. This motlon passed with a 5 ta 0 vote. <br /> Page 10#6 <br />