Laserfiche WebLink
� 1VIENiORA1VDUM:_ ` ' �'_ � �a, � < � ' <br /> ;s <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Bill Wells, City Administrator <br /> Ton Kellogg, City Engineer <br /> �� . <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Asst..City Admin. - Long Term Strategy �y <br /> Date: January 12, 2009 � <br /> Subject: Surface Water Management Plan Update- Authorization to Commence <br /> . (For January 13 Work Session-Formal Action January 26) <br /> List of Attachments � <br /> A- Bonestroo Proposal Dated 1-8-09 <br /> B - Excerpts from Met Counci12030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan: Pp. 83-87 <br /> � --�- C- MCWD Mandate & Checklists . <br /> SWMP Update Required. The Orono Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) was <br /> completed in 2001 by Bonestroo &Associates and received formal Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br /> District approval in 2002. There are a number of regulatory changes that have occurred since <br /> 2002 that we are required by statute to address, as well as mandates from Metropolitan Council <br /> as described in their 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan (see excerpts, pp. 83-87 <br /> from that doctunent). A significant change since 2002 is the requirement to meet specified levels <br /> of phosphorus reduction. <br /> Because the level of expertise required to address these changes is beyond that available in- <br /> house,the attached proposal to update the SWMP was requested of Bonestroo &Associates. The <br /> intent is to bring the SWMP into compliance in a timeframe commensurate with completion of <br /> the Comp Plan. �� <br /> Scope. This proposal has received a significant level of scrutiny by staff to ensure that,the <br /> required mandates are addressed without excessive expenditures. For instance, we have had iwo <br /> meetings with Bob Barth of Bonestroo regarding the specific elements to be updated, and have <br /> met with MCWD staff to clarify the level of detail and range of options for meeting our <br /> phosphorus reduction requirements. <br /> The atta.ched proposal has been reduced in scope and cost from an earlier version received in <br /> December 2008, eliminating review of the CSPP (Sewer Plan) Chapter which sta.ff believes is <br /> unnecessary. The proposal also converts the Phosphorus Reduction Plan.work to an hourly rate <br /> which provides some flexibility in the collaboration between staff, City Engineer and MCWD in <br /> " the iterative process needed to devise an acceptable plan. Further, the creation of a Design Guide <br /> providing detail for developers planning to work in the City has been sepaxately priced as an <br /> option,with two levels of detail (see page 4 of proposal). Staff believes that either the Level 1 or • <br /> Level 2 Design Guide would be very valuable in providing the justification that developers have <br /> begun to demand relative to stormwater management requirements and fees given the�current <br /> economic climate; however,the creation of the Design Guide is not as time-critical as the SWMP <br /> update. . <br />