My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2010 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
06-21-2010 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2012 4:08:14 PM
Creation date
8/14/2012 4:08:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#10-3473 RPUD Amendment <br /> June 17,2010 ' <br /> Page 3 <br /> For purposes of the following discussion, staff is using the term"assisted living facilities"to • <br /> iriclude nursing homes, rest homes,retirement homes,memory care facilities, skilled nursing <br /> facilities (but not hospitals, sanitariums or similar institutions, or licensed residential care <br /> facilities). <br /> Proposed RPUD Amendment <br /> The RPUD District is the only distxict in which Orono allows multifamily attached dwellings as <br /> a permitted use, and the RPUD code section establishes specific standards for such dwellings <br /> with regards to setbacks, separation of uses, height limitations and outside storage limitations, as <br /> well as other development standards applicable to both multifamily attached and single family <br /> dwelling developments. � <br /> Because assisted living facilities are likely to be somewhat si.milar in character to multifamily <br /> uses in their impacts,�and because the appropriate standards for regulating those impacts are <br /> generally in place within the RPUD District standards, it follows that"assisted living facilities" <br /> would be an appropriate use in the RPUD District. <br /> Permitted Use or Conditional Use? <br /> Esta.blishing"assisted living facilities" as a permitted use in the RPUD District would subject it <br /> directly to all the standazds established in that District, all of which were created to be applicable <br /> to strictly residential use. The value in making"assisted living facilities" a conditional use is <br /> the ability of the City to impose additional appropriate conditions in its approvals. Why would � <br /> we want this ability? Because there may be aspects of the assisted living facility use that,while <br /> perhaps subtle, are not within the `norm' for residential dwelling use. An example is that there <br /> will be employees working fizll-time at the site that do not live there; and there is the likelihood <br /> y of more service and delivery vehicle traffic than a standard multi-family dwelling situation. <br /> ' For the above reasons, staff believes it would be most appropriate to add"assisted living <br /> facilities"to the RPUD District as a conditional use. This has the additional benefit of subjecting <br /> the use to the various general conditional use standards that ensure appropriate development. <br /> " Proposed Amendment Text and Definitions <br /> The various definitions in Attachment A are included to generate discussion about the variety of <br /> assisted living options or nuances the City could potentially see proposed as our population ages. <br /> However,the scope of this amendment is intended to be fairly narrow at this time, and does not <br /> intend to address the appropriate zoning for higher institutional uses such as hospitals. <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.