|
�' � � �
<br /> Item#11-CC Agenda-12/I]/06
<br /> File#06-3234/35[Toml Pages 94j
<br /> . �^�4'`� r��"�s
<br /> ��e��r�,xb n�'�'"4'{�"ve'y'
<br /> 1. The properties are located witlun t11e�i,�R��.B;��;,One Fa.mily Lakeshore
<br /> Residential Zotun District re uircng:a i u�nuniuii'xof 140' in lot widtlz a.ud
<br /> 1.0 acres of conti u ous dr buldalile land�w`�lun�each�newly created lot.
<br /> g Y y����.� `r,a,.�t,� �:���,�r�r�+ �
<br /> . t� ��� s�, ����-� �
<br /> � ���� .���'��� ,�''���i� �� ��';�
<br /> �.�^'�, n � : 'xE9'��� �4�:$.��� w rr�1-.a
<br /> � 2. The proposed lot line rearra�genie,�nfi��aud� street vacafian��encornpasses
<br /> :.�-�� � ��,.s���� �``.
<br /> tl�ree residential lots and a part`o�aoate.d Lake Street,�con�rung a total
<br /> �.�
<br /> of 0.58 acres of land. ������,�-�
<br /> `�;�3��='�w�����
<br /> .w.....�
<br /> �� �������
<br /> � r"tcata��-`�
<br /> 3. Upon conlpletioii of the lo�,l ne�ieai.7angemey���4�1����Nortli Shore Drive
<br /> will contaiil approaimate�y��Y�1.;55�w.s.f. (0.26 �acres)�and 60 in defined
<br /> widtli wluch will continii`e ffo�,be noneonfornung ��wi,.t respect to lot area
<br /> �'��'r� �f��'�� -�
<br /> and lot width witl�n:��he� LR Al`B��One,���Eanuly Lakeshore Residential
<br /> .� �.
<br /> . Zoning District. k:�'����� ,���"�' ���"��r��� .���
<br /> �. �.� t+t�
<br /> :�=sc�. �.�° -�'4' �s'`' �`��
<br /> � �„ i
<br /> �"4�5`��`, y "�Yf�k��
<br /> � 4. Upoii conipletio"r��of Clilie lot�(]y�,.`����rea�.�ra�n�gement, 4725 North Shore Drive
<br /> h��4.�� �22``� �°' 9 �J y il )
<br /> will coiitain���p o�imately�l3;��3�2,�7��s��,�(0.�2 acres) and 75 ui defined
<br /> width whi�ch�,v�:ll continue to�"`6e�nonconformiilg witli respect to lot area
<br /> �}15.isl°a�Y� � ��,t,a•'�&-+ -;y`+Y,;�.l
<br /> a�1d lot�w�d��Rwrthin flie LR 1$��One Fanlily Lakeshore Resideiztial
<br /> Zomng 13.istr�ct{3��., �
<br /> �,�� .�� �'������r'���
<br /> r� �%��.��f�+,� K�...r , �
<br /> f�5����,Bu�fo,r�.t�he avail�b,�ty,��f all three parcels for combiiiation/division at the
<br /> �����,;�,�samez�ime�;it is robable t�iatattempts would be niade to redevelop each of
<br /> ���� "� s,� ' �`�.`�.1���..���, � ,e;,�� ��,>
<br /> "� the�hree,pa�cels individua.11y, or at least to redevelop the westerly parcel
<br /> . �� -..,,;. '�t`"`� .fy��x�:.�n."i1 'kY
<br /> �..i,�, M
<br /> p ��� separately�f�,oxu,the easterly two parcels, resultuig in t11e need for greater , .
<br /> ��� �� variatices�and�less flexibility of site design due to the narrow, steep nature
<br /> ���" :,. �na����
<br /> �;�� ` r'` � of the lots 5��j�hxe�"o�portunity to require a shared driveway access would
<br /> �'1�����v la�� � � .
<br /> z, F� ��,�,. also be lostr k+l��dditionally, because two of the parcels have been assessed
<br /> s;?��ri����,n•}P'��, tr��� ;�'
<br /> � �.�hfor and ��ou�,c�ed with mtuucipal sewer, and have been develo�ed with
<br /> ��`�����„ .�� �'
<br /> �`� ���ky��s�,ngle�arnily��resideiices for ivaizy years, it is uiilikely tlzat the City would
<br /> �`��, „de�iiy�,`��aria,ii�ces for a total of two homes on the three paicels. The
<br /> ���io�ose�,�'��coinbination/subdivision results in two lots that cail be
<br /> p��;:p�,:�,n�r
<br /> developed more efficieiitly than if such a re-arrangemeiit was ilot
<br /> OCCl1TT1Tlg.
<br /> 6. The City Council finds ihat the vacation of a portion of Lake St�eei: as
<br /> proposed is ui keepiiig witlz t11e public iilterest and not in conflict with tlie
<br /> provisioiis of the Orouo Conunuuity Management Pla.ii iu consideraiion of
<br /> the following findings:
<br /> Page 3 of 9
<br />
|