|
. . � .( .i�_ r 1
<br /> Item#11-CC Agenda-12/I]/06
<br /> File#06-3234/35(Total Pages 94J
<br /> Breiner iuquired wlietlier the Commission feels there are allowances or l�ardships with respect to tlle
<br /> access,site topography, and bluffto allow a home on the westernmost lot(4731),which fi�nctiona(ly will
<br /> be a walk-out home with two levels above but would actually be defined as a three-story house by the
<br /> City's current methods.
<br /> ��E�`.F
<br /> � EC��.t I- ,;i�itif;k., .
<br /> ' 't,iv}A:;sX�. r .
<br /> , +{�:'k�i'`k t.�.��d`;nF';:
<br /> h's�f .�1�5 1 ti��j,�����24�f
<br /> �C�v.. �fi�*�JlW�13"/i,%.'3 4i .
<br /> Curtis noted this is a c�uestion she would like the Planniug!;Commi�stczn::to��da`sauss but that it is not •
<br /> ' �ij �+F x .^,�fSa *�`,�f% '`M`�i-�-T�'�}
<br /> t`���O"'ij �`��t{���y�1��F.�,t7�-,.,�i'u�-.
<br /> necessarily the case in this application. Curtis stated({t�he�chali�l,e�n(g�..es o�the lot;make?it�,very difEcult to
<br /> ' '+y����Y�M4�'�.b'"YY�Si^Y,f' }4{'l�a��xy1,��4�+.µ.�Y�Y�.
<br /> k'��r`'E,k��'v`�,��ufP. �l�����.���1.;( �rs
<br /> consh•uct a two and a half story house. 'y��I�.Er�y�3��,,�,`. "'x���"'N�'���if�
<br /> �?,+��,d�' K�'���`h �i��'.�!}i�'"
<br /> �$X,�y:xfir'^v�`?��''4�'�1�^�'��i'�.
<br /> ��"' �Sr��` x., v
<br /> Brenier stated the Planning Commission is veiy consisten�on i�hs,lieig�it'restrictions and that sl�e would
<br /> �� �.��-y,{, �. �
<br /> �d"..1'�����rF��{., '
<br /> not be in favor of allowin an hin over iwo an alf"stories. � �„�;���'l�''
<br /> g Yt g d��.h �.�: �.M���,
<br /> t�r�������� �����,��'`�,��';�
<br /> � x'��.�u�'ed`����'s",�.�",��"z �'t`o5t�.}��r
<br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Comin�s��f1ia�°fhe�s,w���l�,i�ot be in fa�or of a residence in eacess
<br /> '�'�f�� �y�,.,i-�'�'�'"r�`�iE,.�w,�
<br /> of iwo and a ha(f stories. ���"�„ u �4��-�,,.�,��,��
<br /> �?r ��`` ��`�� �,���` ��'�����:_�
<br /> �� ���?��� c�.���
<br /> Bremer inquired of tl�e Planning Comuussion whetl�.ef��the home on:the western lot should be moved
<br /> ������'�r ����� ��
<br /> %i� ��„'^F Ltc .�,y'��p��;�.
<br /> closer to the county road to allow�or,reorieutation ofa�herdri�eway.
<br /> �qq�i��y�a ��s,f3��".'��i_r..' .
<br /> G"��'( 4i �.+ C �A.��i.
<br /> !�%eR.`�{t��l Y,'�5 .- .
<br /> Curtis noted if tl�e home wei e;reloc�ed closer to the road a variance to the rear yard setback wou[d be
<br /> ���4��, ��f �
<br /> �������
<br /> required but��uld�a"Iloyv fory addrtioiial�,ofF st`r�eet parking.
<br /> ���5?4���Y'���'��;�Lq, �`�"''Yt1,.,,","_�,Ln('�'�(,1.y�c�. �
<br /> p��'Y,�ik''���t.�Y.s�r� �,'"'fi,6u�'�s'�'�er-�'� .'ti�'�'� 31i�.7�' .
<br /> Kemp�stated�he would���o�befop�osed to relocatirt�the l�ouse closer to the i•oad since it is consistent with
<br /> �����r��°�� '�l�'�.n�+��,�YU2a� d.�;^��•O
<br /> z� �-�,� �`'-�.2;r��,� •c
<br /> theYofher`homes iu the neighborhoo'd��:,
<br /> �?��� ���u��� ,
<br /> s" � � �a�{��'•�� .
<br /> Ralu�sta�ed,,rf tliere is no method4for�the driveway to be moved closer to the property line,he would not
<br /> �,+a�y�.,# ,�,+fir� r�M,e�r.�*
<br /> '4°��Y�,y+�Y'`��2��1 `hx�y_ ��yl .� . .
<br /> ��.C,�.M�u)Ti Y�f'� "t"� .t�y 1+tfK�'i"'a"�i� '
<br /> be oppos,e�t�tay�iehouse being,r,ye,yy'Zocafed.
<br /> `'L�tY �����'�'t' }JG��`fi Y C-;v,�FY
<br /> �,��L91.�' a}�.'2F��Aj�
<br /> �'�� ���
<br /> Jurgens stated i�e�oc�ting�flwe�t�se closer to the road would result in the driveway becoming steeper
<br /> ������������..� .
<br /> unless the garage is a se`d�and that lie personally feels a 20-24 percent driveway is not a good option for
<br /> �,;�,�-
<br /> driveways in Minnesota. Jurgens stated there is barely enough room on the western lot to park a car in
<br /> front of the garage witliout l�anging over into the neighboring lot. Jurgens stated in his opinion an unsafe
<br /> conditio.n is being created with the current design of the driveway.
<br /> Bremer i��quired whether the house should be oriented further to the west.
<br />
|