Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 2 <br /> t t"'V• <br /> �/ •;'������1 <br /> Date Appliption Receh►ed: 12/15/15 r ; � 1 <br /> Date Appliption Considered as Complete:12/15/15 ,�'��' � <br /> 60-Day Review Perfod FxpEres: 2/13/16 ���V�,��� ' L�� <br /> 60-Day Review Extenston i/22/i6to: 4/13/16 '�kESHo�� <br /> To: Chair Leskinen and Planning Commission Members <br /> Jessica Loftus,City Administrator <br /> From: Mike Gaffron,Senior Planner <br /> Date: February 11, 2016 <br /> Subject: #16-3799, Integrity Remodeling& Design Group o/b/o Matt&Jamie Hanson, <br /> 2050 Spates Avenue <br /> - Variances <br /> - Continued Public Hearing <br /> Applfoartfon Summary: The applicant initially requested front/street artd side setback <br /> variances in order to construct a covered open porch to the rear and side of an existing <br /> nonconforming accessory building located nearer the street than the principal residence <br /> structure. The appEication as originally presented also reguired variances for indivldual and <br /> total accessory structure footprint areas, as the initially propdsed additian con�erted the <br /> building's status to that of an Oversize Accessory Structure (OAS). <br /> Appiicant has revised the plans to reduce the size of the building additions and the extent of <br /> required variances.The builcfing as proposed is no tonger an OAS. <br /> Planning Commission Recommendotion i/19/16: Planning Commission provided the <br /> following general direction wlth regard to the proposal: <br /> - Applicant should bring back a design that daes not exceed 1,000 s.f.footprint so that <br /> this will not become subject to the Oversize Accessory Structufe standards. <br /> - Appficant should provide a detailed narrative regarding the practical difflculties that <br /> support this application for variances. <br /> - Revised plan should address the avoidance or relocation of the sewage ejector tank. <br /> Staff Recommendation: If Planning Cammission determines that the practical difficulties test <br /> Is met and the variances are justified for the revised ptan, then a recommendation for approval <br /> may be in order. If Planning Commisslon ffnds that the practical difficulties test is not met, a <br /> �ecommendation for denial,ar tabling for further revisions, may be appropriate. <br /> Zoning District: LR-1A,One Family Lakeshore Residential, 2.0 acres/200'min. width <br /> Lot Area/Wldth: 56,846 s.f. (1.31 acre),49.8'wide at 50'front setback line <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Revised Survey/Site Plan <br /> Exhibit B. Revised Plans&Sketches of Propased Addition <br /> Exhibit C. Revised Practical Di�culties Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit D. Notice of Planning Commission Action 1/22/16 <br /> Exhibit E. Draft PC Minutes of 1/19/16 <br /> Exhibit F. Memo &Exhibits of 1/13/16 <br />