|
d�:t .+�'. �'1�,4'� .,'& Z r :. ; .. ..��,,,.r, ,e.,aw�,+rc..r�^,.nr7'�"a'+��+�?r4,�w 3w►w�
<br /> ���� y� �� „� n�"' �u���``' c�,s�4�rq� "�`. � � � �� �'y. :�� �e r m-� �
<br /> i� � � � ����� y�,���y �
<br /> � � � �°
<br /> b, � �' ���� � �
<br /> �} ���
<br /> il'� '
<br /> -�� � -.
<br /> :t X a�.; 5"��� �.,.�"� ��= �
<br /> �3, � ��
<br /> r
<br /> �� ��,�,
<br /> �y�
<br /> �: �;
<br /> ��, �— — .
<br /> ' `� �,. �`��V� 1-M:'r1ti" ;�b �4J ,: ". .......
<br /> ..:i��' I��'��I i°S",� .� �"',� �G t�.11� j �` �,.'
<br /> .;� w,� � � ♦ �. � � - ��� .
<br /> . � ,'�`'� �.
<br /> �,� � , �„_,,,.
<br /> � �, � ,�� �� ,�:� � � � • �
<br /> :, � � �� k �� � � � ��� �at� �� oR,o�vo
<br /> �. � �. M. M d.7��� � ' ./
<br /> � ,�' �, �,�x�, �.� �� . . _+�'.�i ffi
<br /> -►.n.
<br /> '� � j��� ��� � �f, ,, - '' "'���:s,� RESOLUTfON OP THE C�TY COUNCiL
<br /> �� , �«" �'j�°,��`f'�; T
<br /> .m 4� `�.�^"'� �:, �'�j l _: ,`�y 6�� � ��. H�. Zi6�
<br /> '�x r r�� ` � •. ��Y��`rw
<br /> .. �� Ci-� . .�1f� f1�3
<br /> l� tf
<br /> �:"f
<br /> . "f�Ay��t','S' , '.. _. .
<br /> 'j, �r � 3. T3�e tlrono Planninq Coamai,ssion reviewed this app7.ication on ApYiI
<br /> i. , � � '', 20 and 1�lay 4, i987, and zeco�aended approval af the proposed va�riance
<br /> .�;,a;.-�.t�;; ., "� based ngon Lhe falZowinq findings:
<br /> � �`"'`'f'��� '� '•. . ''. .. 0) The groperty averagen 40' in W3dth, encarapasses Q.21 acre in '���
<br /> ' ' -'-•?�� - '� area, and aontsins an existinq residence located 1.9' lrom the •
<br /> • � : aorth ai.de lot line and 12.3' frora the south side lot line.
<br /> .y
<br /> � ` � t B) Becauae the epplicant has aeterminea he must replace his
<br /> �� � , : fouadation in order to add a proposed aecond story to his hause,
<br /> 1 �;u;:� ;� , he has the opportnnity to ceatar the residence on his Iot, there-
<br /> ' � � by making his houae more conformiag to the required •etbacks.
<br /> .����►, _
<br /> ���� ����'��� :f � 10' sido $e nd �tory addition wil l encroach 3' i.nto eac3� required ':
<br /> tback zone, but Will have no significant effect on -
<br /> _ �� �:���*� a�*�� .��,�c�;;� � li ht, air or o :
<br /> 9 pea space enjoyed by neighboriaq propertiec.
<br /> � s�,� ��S�.���� ��� , , . ,.
<br /> ;;:, � ;� � � � � ';„r � D� Proposed hardcover in the 7S-2S0' lakeshore setback sone Miil ."
<br /> :-�', ,c�;;� ,.t increase from 27.8� existiag to 30.8s by addition of a deck and �
<br /> ;' ��: �� ; -. , room expansion. The hardship in this case is the �ma7,I area of
<br /> �.. �-'' `. ' , �� .. the lot. There are no proposed hardcover incxeases ia the 0-75' -:.�
<br /> ;`� u p��� �,t Y' , lakeahore aetbae3e zone {6.ea existing). �
<br /> E ' ' �#„` � �" *.t�� '
<br /> ' *��� � i��'�` ` 8) Planninq Commisa.ipa finds no hardshi to
<br /> - E �� ��" `� ��� ' � � extention that will eacroach p g �ustifp n honse
<br /> �` � � �� paet the avera t housa lakeshore
<br /> t� „� setback line.
<br /> °' �y � ,�; �
<br /> i ��'� � s �` � F) ' Thq Planning Ca�om�iasion finda that the location of the second
<br /> �w ra � • � � atory deck on the lake side of the house to the south is snch
<br /> �:. �A�,� �` � `x, t ` that 3t is appropriate to define the 'anerage lakeshore sevond-
<br /> Y; , � story deck setback line' as aho++n oa �xhibit A attached, c�e�iaed
<br /> ��$ � '� '�;�� ";, , � '� as a line betMeen the Northeast corner of the �ecoad atorp deak
<br /> 4 7�;f;k ��•: : at 2032 ShaBywoad Road and the Nartheast corner of the first
<br /> `� ���.., � '��';i• story deak at 2C16 ShadyNood Road. Plannibq Comomiaaion finQa �o
<br /> � � �;� 's " . .�nstification ta allow extention of a second story deck past this
<br /> ���.T�� ,�. :.y - defined setbaak Iine. Likerrfse, a qround level deck tor 2024 ��
<br /> ,��� � ShaQywood Road should not extend pnat the avernqe ground lavel
<br /> � ��°:� x ', �: deck �etback liae as defined on Exhibit A attached. :�
<br /> ; ?� ' _ ' . �
<br /> �t�`"'`� �� ' �'�4. ' The,Git Coancil has conaidered this application includinq the �
<br /> �j~ }���;;'� �` ��_.'findings a d recommendations of the Pl�aninq Commission, report� by
<br /> ,:� Y f '�� r'�� City staff, comneenta by the appiicant and the effect of the pro poaed
<br /> �/' :,� `� ` variar.ae on the heaJ.th, safety ane3 velfare of the co�mnunity. �- �; ;
<br /> ��, ` . Paqe 2 of 5 ' "
<br /> ;„�� 1 ry,- �, .
<br /> � �.� `'..t , .
<br /> S � �a r j.. ..
<br /> � � i
<br /> yr' .`Fr �n"" .:r . .
<br /> . ,; tr ._��� .- .
<br /> > �,- +�-...�
<br /> ^y p..... � ,�^�� ,._�y, .
<br /> � 4`'� :�`F. �is�n .s d `��f!��9
<br /> a ��] '�*�.. y , e, r� �� � - ��"'°:'i;
<br /> ^ i �"p t# . � .
<br /> � 6M � .
<br /> (` . ! ,�q}�C� ��, ��
<br /> � �� � ^` � F �� .�� �� �� � '
<br /> �y 5
<br /> F ' '' t � ,r � n¢ k {I;4. J r�aq}��S r,
<br /> � q�i 3
<br /> a.'�:r� t w �,�:� �^ �i�' '��,J+ar �• `�,r�Y f°�'' r` °`�b,`� ' j� �
<br /> �'� y
<br /> I.rB, . �k"•. w.Y..rx�-!�.a�i':.�"�.,�'rrr�''�,� . �.'TMi���c,.`e_ u�`at,$�i'«.3�.��R.c�.k �. �.�1 L . �r. r . , ,
<br />
|