Laserfiche WebLink
d�:t .+�'. �'1�,4'� .,'& Z r :. ; .. ..��,,,.r, ,e.,aw�,+rc..r�^,.nr7'�"a'+��+�?r4,�w 3w►w� <br /> ���� y� �� „� n�"' �u���``' c�,s�4�rq� "�`. � � � �� �'y. :�� �e r m-� � <br /> i� � � � ����� y�,���y � <br /> � � � �° <br /> b, � �' ���� � � <br /> �} ��� <br /> il'� ' <br /> -�� � -. <br /> :t X a�.; 5"��� �.,.�"� ��= � <br /> �3, � �� <br /> r <br /> �� ��,�, <br /> �y� <br /> �: �; <br /> ��, �— — . <br /> ' `� �,. �`��V� 1-M:'r1ti" ;�b �4J ,: ". ....... <br /> ..:i��' I��'��I i°S",� .� �"',� �G t�.11� j �` �,.' <br /> .;� w,� � � ♦ �. � � - ��� . <br /> . � ,'�`'� �. <br /> �,� � , �„_,,,. <br /> � �, � ,�� �� ,�:� � � � • � <br /> :, � � �� k �� � � � ��� �at� �� oR,o�vo <br /> �. � �. M. M d.7��� � ' ./ <br /> � ,�' �, �,�x�, �.� �� . . _+�'.�i ffi <br /> -►.n. <br /> '� � j��� ��� � �f, ,, - '' "'���:s,� RESOLUTfON OP THE C�TY COUNCiL <br /> �� , �«" �'j�°,��`f'�; T <br /> .m 4� `�.�^"'� �:, �'�j l _: ,`�y 6�� � ��. H�. Zi6� <br /> '�x r r�� ` � •. ��Y��`rw <br /> .. �� Ci-� . .�1f� f1�3 <br /> l� tf <br /> �:"f <br /> . "f�Ay��t','S' , '.. _. . <br /> 'j, �r � 3. T3�e tlrono Planninq Coamai,ssion reviewed this app7.ication on ApYiI <br /> i. , � � '', 20 and 1�lay 4, i987, and zeco�aended approval af the proposed va�riance <br /> .�;,a;.-�.t�;; ., "� based ngon Lhe falZowinq findings: <br /> � �`"'`'f'��� '� '•. . ''. .. 0) The groperty averagen 40' in W3dth, encarapasses Q.21 acre in '��� <br /> ' ' -'-•?�� - '� area, and aontsins an existinq residence located 1.9' lrom the • <br /> • � : aorth ai.de lot line and 12.3' frora the south side lot line. <br /> .y <br /> � ` � t B) Becauae the epplicant has aeterminea he must replace his <br /> �� � , : fouadation in order to add a proposed aecond story to his hause, <br /> 1 �;u;:� ;� , he has the opportnnity to ceatar the residence on his Iot, there- <br /> ' � � by making his houae more conformiag to the required •etbacks. <br /> .����►, _ <br /> ���� ����'��� :f � 10' sido $e nd �tory addition wil l encroach 3' i.nto eac3� required ': <br /> tback zone, but Will have no significant effect on - <br /> _ �� �:���*� a�*�� .��,�c�;;� � li ht, air or o : <br /> 9 pea space enjoyed by neighboriaq propertiec. <br /> � s�,� ��S�.���� ��� , , . ,. <br /> ;;:, � ;� � � � � ';„r � D� Proposed hardcover in the 7S-2S0' lakeshore setback sone Miil ." <br /> :-�', ,c�;;� ,.t increase from 27.8� existiag to 30.8s by addition of a deck and � <br /> ;' ��: �� ; -. , room expansion. The hardship in this case is the �ma7,I area of <br /> �.. �-'' `. ' , �� .. the lot. There are no proposed hardcover incxeases ia the 0-75' -:.� <br /> ;`� u p��� �,t Y' , lakeahore aetbae3e zone {6.ea existing). � <br /> E ' ' �#„` � �" *.t�� ' <br /> ' *��� � i��'�` ` 8) Planninq Commisa.ipa finds no hardshi to <br /> - E �� ��" `� ��� ' � � extention that will eacroach p g �ustifp n honse <br /> �` � � �� paet the avera t housa lakeshore <br /> t� „� setback line. <br /> °' �y � ,�; � <br /> i ��'� � s �` � F) ' Thq Planning Ca�om�iasion finda that the location of the second <br /> �w ra � • � � atory deck on the lake side of the house to the south is snch <br /> �:. �A�,� �` � `x, t ` that 3t is appropriate to define the 'anerage lakeshore sevond- <br /> Y; , � story deck setback line' as aho++n oa �xhibit A attached, c�e�iaed <br /> ��$ � '� '�;�� ";, , � '� as a line betMeen the Northeast corner of the �ecoad atorp deak <br /> 4 7�;f;k ��•: : at 2032 ShaBywoad Road and the Nartheast corner of the first <br /> `� ���.., � '��';i• story deak at 2C16 ShadyNood Road. Plannibq Comomiaaion finQa �o <br /> � � �;� 's " . .�nstification ta allow extention of a second story deck past this <br /> ���.T�� ,�. :.y - defined setbaak Iine. Likerrfse, a qround level deck tor 2024 �� <br /> ,��� � ShaQywood Road should not extend pnat the avernqe ground lavel <br /> � ��°:� x ', �: deck �etback liae as defined on Exhibit A attached. :� <br /> ; ?� ' _ ' . � <br /> �t�`"'`� �� ' �'�4. ' The,Git Coancil has conaidered this application includinq the � <br /> �j~ }���;;'� �` ��_.'findings a d recommendations of the Pl�aninq Commission, report� by <br /> ,:� Y f '�� r'�� City staff, comneenta by the appiicant and the effect of the pro poaed <br /> �/' :,� `� ` variar.ae on the heaJ.th, safety ane3 velfare of the co�mnunity. �- �; ; <br /> ��, ` . Paqe 2 of 5 ' " <br /> ;„�� 1 ry,- �, . <br /> � �.� `'..t , . <br /> S � �a r j.. .. <br /> � � i <br /> yr' .`Fr �n"" .:r . . <br /> . ,; tr ._��� .- . <br /> > �,- +�-...� <br /> ^y p..... � ,�^�� ,._�y, . <br /> � 4`'� :�`F. �is�n .s d `��f!��9 <br /> a ��] '�*�.. y , e, r� �� � - ��"'°:'i; <br /> ^ i �"p t# . � . <br /> � 6M � . <br /> (` . ! ,�q}�C� ��, �� <br /> � �� � ^` � F �� .�� �� �� � ' <br /> �y 5 <br /> F ' '' t � ,r � n¢ k {I;4. J r�aq}��S r, <br /> � q�i 3 <br /> a.'�:r� t w �,�:� �^ �i�' '��,J+ar �• `�,r�Y f°�'' r` °`�b,`� ' j� � <br /> �'� y <br /> I.rB, . �k"•. w.Y..rx�-!�.a�i':.�"�.,�'rrr�''�,� . �.'TMi���c,.`e_ u�`at,$�i'«.3�.��R.c�.k �. �.�1 L . �r. r . , , <br />