|
,,� .;� �_ , .,_-. o.-,� � _, '�,,.F°�4 a.�'F r = �,.,,,....�-.�� -
<br /> . g� �.'A � s • 1� - � , .. ...
<br /> ♦ ��
<br /> ,#,' � � '��g ���9/` `=� �� � *��.ua ��1' z ��,rYi.,�r, y-�, .M,�„,_ Y..+y,�..
<br /> �r
<br /> .�. � ' ,: M� i .�'`�€�� �yw,�.��.. _
<br /> ..� �.. ' . k ti y�'�m�f"��� ., � .
<br /> ♦�.,
<br /> ��� t. �" e �ti ` �
<br /> T
<br /> � �,"", '��� � �' `��d�d'y�` � r.
<br /> i. .§N����k� .,,� �� _,�
<br /> ss;� � f""V'�r.. tf b k�. ��� �.�
<br /> f1j� �
<br /> �` k a`� 3� ��', .1
<br /> � g x � •4.•�S���r� ,�•
<br /> ,'M�� � � kh�y �r,:'` � �� $ 1
<br /> � Y'M6��g��'.t �W Y�� � ,� ;.:�y . .. .
<br /> ��r... !�' ,+.�� ���„ ��R'�l g _
<br /> - � �..r z, }� -j�-�° ,
<br /> � ..�F7 �� ' ' f � �.�
<br /> r '° V.�, � � Y i.t�y. .
<br /> � '�',�yy r�� . ,y�. y •:`��. � . .
<br /> ,.� 1 � t������f s City ��' al�,Ol�,T�l
<br /> : � ,�h-�
<br /> . . .J`'d�. T �f, "+�r ',V �-Y7 ,
<br /> J� :. N�w .
<br /> I ��v� , ; atn�°�10 '-
<br /> � � *��, . •a. ` '''�,:' RESO�IJTION OF THE CITY COUNCtE.
<br /> �`��`, ��� ; " ' ':,� MO. 2168
<br /> „r�, .� . • .._�, .
<br /> , i.�''s�,�r t e o �,
<br /> i a�. �k r'. � ., ��..
<br /> ��� �r ,..Yc�a
<br /> ���ry�" � y`a � '
<br /> * � ... 81Y '':. � ,..,.
<br /> t`�� sA:� .��. i��h f t��j�• �^n„1 t �v ..� i .;, � ' .
<br /> " '"�' t 3. . Th� Urotto Planninq Co�aai�aion reviewed th�.a applicati�on on April '�
<br /> �r �� ' ��x� 3.r'�Y-', ZO aad May 4, I987. anfl raco�►ended approval o� the proposed variance
<br /> ��:�� z ���'i�� ;�� ;;`'�. ba��d ugon the foilowinq fiaQiaqss
<br /> �,�1`�"� � r�ej� ° +y . �+ . ' � �
<br /> �' `- �5� 4�Y�;.���, . ., '� q) Tho property averages 40' in width, encompasses O.Zl acre in I
<br /> � �.��r.� �• _ � :: • ;;s. erea, and aontnins en existing resiaence iocated 1.9' �ro�a the �.
<br /> Y� ' �� �:'�,., , -�� :<: north aid� Iat line and ].2.3' fxqm the south side loL line.
<br /> r� '� ti .�� �+.k.
<br /> �" �.������' �'?`� " �,, B) "' B�Cs,use the appliaant has deteratinea he aaust replace his ',
<br /> �� z.`��s��"�;�,htb, �°' ". fotu�dation in order to add a praposed second story to hia ltonse,
<br /> ,: �' s��i.�,,��t��;���,, �; ha has the opportusiity to center the residence on hia lot. there-
<br /> s': �<<�,,N ,►;� ,� � � by makiaq his house more ao�n�osming ta the required .setbacks. �
<br /> � '.i�p gr,�:�m+ � ��%�#a r+ ' , ,
<br /> }� , �;;:�� � , : C) � The aecond etory add3tion will encroach 3' into each required ";
<br /> ,�� , �'a'`�"� '"�.�.,�`'� 10' side aetback sone, but will hane no eiqnificant effect oa `
<br /> �`: '���"�,`: ` '�'^_`: light, air or opan space en joyed by neighborinq properties.
<br /> �,;k^ .��i '��� . - . . , . � � ��- .
<br /> �"� � � ��.� ;ti,, ` '; �� D) � Propoaed hardrover in th� 75-250' lakeshore setback zone rill �
<br /> bz�ty ' '�: �� ` �r ' �", increase from 27.St existin q to 3�.8• b y addition of a deck and
<br /> ����"�� .� °� �5�,,; , .= ` �' � ), room expaasion. The hardahip in this case is tha smali area of '-
<br /> _�� 'r 1:�+ �"�SA �4 ;�.. th� lot. - There are no proposed hsrdcover increagQs in the 0-75' ';:;
<br /> ,�} �{�, „ :�.� , 1` ` lakeshore aetback zone (6.Ss exiatinq}.
<br /> , I I.qt�.�`..� �Y 3.,�� 7.� � `� <�,.,. .. . . ' .
<br /> . a :�t� �;'w"i�x t'(.:�- . .
<br /> •����. 4=� • 8� Planninq Contmiss3ca finds na hardship to justify a hons• ._
<br /> x�+ ��,v.�.���e: � .� '' extention that will enCroach past the average house lakeshor� �
<br /> ' � �;��;, �� �3.�� ,� .� �.. setback line.
<br /> �lf� �?n{ 9 s•P: �t} ...
<br /> � , - , FI �' The Planning Coannission finds that the locatioa of thQ second
<br /> ,R- r ��, ` -`, `story dack on the lake side of the houae to the soath ia such -
<br /> a � �" ` ,; , ',.' th`at it is appropriate to define the *avezaqe lakeshore secoad `
<br /> 4-*�� �� �M-,p�� '' �{�ozy Qeck setback line' ns ahown on Bxhibit A attached, dafined �;;
<br /> k�k� ;,. �`; ; _.. "_ �. as a line betWeen the tiortheast cornnr of the second story deek F
<br /> �f:_ f ;' � at 2032 Shadyvood Road and the Northeast corner of the first .
<br /> �-- a"" r` k '. ` '� ato deck at Z016 Shad
<br /> ,,�.� �,��' , ry y+�ood Road. Planning Co�a3,asio�a finda uo
<br /> "��?y^ �+ � �;.x� �; justification to a].law extention of a second atory dack pnst this ,
<br /> A� ���.� , L' ti:� defined setback line. Likewise, a ground level deck for 202� ''
<br /> � ��� �` ��` ' Shad paat the avernqe ground levei --,
<br /> +.. ;�,� f �,�i s t ywood Road ahould not extend
<br /> �'�`�*'"`y �';�i �; `" - deck satbaCk line as defined oa Bxhibit A attached.
<br /> � f r��� . 1� `., Y,
<br /> �rr� .. �y ? + ��. .: ,_ . .
<br /> 1��
<br /> _ ��r,�,�-�<�"`��_�� 4 ' The C3ty Council has considered this appJ.i.cation includinq the ;;
<br /> -��f- .� f -,•. findiaqs aad recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
<br /> ���` �`.^�f s�` '• City staff, comaients by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
<br /> %"'� ' ��^°'',�n"�r�� .: variance oa the health, smfety and welfare of the community.
<br /> �. �� ��:�� � ;. � � �:� � Page 2 of S .
<br /> �J�����X�`�� i Q J�,�.r� a��.'1 ' . *
<br /> 'y .�1A`[ .�:'.Ea� i
<br /> S A h .T
<br /> � Y t
<br /> ,�. 4 ^?}�+b �"e���y�'tn` i�A � \
<br /> S ,� e� '� �S''�,b IT'°rM 1YY��,� .t, �,� i [ . ' . ..
<br /> .n«as�� � �.�'�'��,,, M a�. � � ^X'a .� .
<br /> k'� '& 'e}�r .� :���i v^�+--�a�o. . . . __ . „
<br /> '4 . 1. 4�f ' � „,:%�
<br /> � .. .
<br /> ��. >� � ""� � .. �,,R.�� 'Nj'> . ��,y ..
<br /> .A" .Y? '1' ` � c� ,�t
<br /> " "� � s ..- t ��.r� i =�� .,��n r �� ��&^�,'��na "��, '*�,,,'�},y . �?��'��,T
<br /> a '•� � � P
<br /> ���' � .�;�'3.�ir.�. ,^'k� ,,�+�y� i � �,.�� tt;�s.rt��`��IL�i"��,ae�9�ii�.�
<br />
|