My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-2016 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
04-18-2016 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:54:05 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 2:54:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 18,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart indicated Staff looks at this as a housekeeping amendment. Since Staff sees the value of sketch <br /> plan reviews,they will continue to recommend them but they will not be a requirement. Removal of the <br /> requirement was based on the recommendation of the City Attorney. <br /> The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 10:30 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 10:30 p.m. <br /> Schoenzeit moved,Thiesse seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3823, City of <br /> Orono,Zoning Code Amendment regarding a process to review concept plans and sketch plans. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 8. #16-3824 CITY OF ORONO, ZONING CODE AMENDMENT REGARDING A PROCESS <br /> TO REVIEW SUBDIVISION EXCEPTIONS, 10:30 P.M.—10:35 P.M. <br /> Barnhart stated he is not requesting action tonight on this item and that it is more to open the discussion <br /> and receive any public feedback on the ordinance. <br /> Currently the City follows state law in their own zoning ordinances for what is considered a subdivision <br /> except for the following actions: <br /> 1. In which all the resulting parcels,tracts, lots or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 <br /> feet in width for residential uses and five acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses; <br /> 2. Creating cemetery lots; <br /> 3. Resulting from court orders or the adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary <br /> as long as each of the two resulting lots meet the requirements of Chapter 78. <br /> The proposed ordinance establishes a process where Staff verifies that a proposal falls within these <br /> criteria. Staff would then generate a document to be received by the County Recorder for filing. <br /> The proposed ordinance also classifies a boundary line adjustment when both lots do not meet the <br /> requirements of the zoning ardinance as a Class I subdivision. Class I subdivisions do not need to be <br /> platted. <br /> Barnhart stated Staff and the City Attorney will continue to work through the draft ordinance and the <br /> Planning Commission should receive public feedback, discuss the draft ordinance if they wish, and then <br /> table action on the ordinance until May. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 10:33 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at p.m. <br /> Page 30 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.