Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF TAE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 18, 2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> reguided for higher density at 10 to 15 units per acre. The City Council agreed to the higher density and <br /> put in place a plan that would allow one or two multi-tenant buildings in the area of the property that is <br /> not within the former landfill. <br /> The area that is not being developed at this time is the former landfill site that was operated back in the <br /> 1960s and 1970s. The landfill has been capped and the applicant has spent quite a bit of time determining <br /> the boundaries of the landfilled area. <br /> The portion of the site proposed for development at this time is high ground overlooking the wetland and <br /> sitting 10 to 15 feet above Wayzata Boulevard. The site being developed is a former homestead and the <br /> site contains a number of mature hardwood trees surrounded by areas of low vegetation formerly <br /> maintained as lawn. The southwesterly portion of the property used to be a landfill for a number of <br /> decades and is currently open space with volunteer tree growth at its perimeter. The existing trees near <br /> the south side of the property provide some measure of visual and sound buffering to the Highway 12 <br /> freeway. <br /> The southerly two-thirds of the property contain a significant area of wetland, a portion of which was <br /> filled as a demolition and/or general landfill during the 1960s-1990s. While no existing wetlands are <br /> being impacted by the proposed development,the applicants are proposing substantial areas of wetland <br /> buffer to be preserved or established along the entire wetland boundaries of the property. Wetland buffers <br /> are shown at 40 feet in width along the portion of the property being developed. Where the 40-foot <br /> buffers are proposed building setbacks are shown as meeting the City required 10-foot setback from the <br /> edge of buffer. The City will require a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands being <br /> preserved. <br /> It is likely a majority of the mature hardwood trees will be removed in order far the development to occur. <br /> The existing trees along Wayzata Boulevard are also at risk of being removed and quite likely to the point <br /> where the existing level of screening between the highway and the proposed development will disappear. <br /> In its place, the applicants are proposing to provide vegetative screening but no berm or other <br /> visual/traffic noise screening is proposed. <br /> It has been the City's practice to rezone properties in the Highway 12 corridor area at the time an <br /> acceptable development plan is approved. Because this property has never been rezoned to match the <br /> CMP-guided density, the current application includes a request for rezoning. The application will be <br /> processed as a rezoning to RPUD and review will be guided by the RPUD standards. The RPUD District <br /> contains detailed development standards with regards to lot size and setbacks, building design, <br /> landscaping, screening and buffering, and trails and recreation. The RPUD District also offers flexibility <br /> as a planned unit development process in that variances from the standards are considered as elements of <br /> the RPUD zoning rather than as variances. <br /> The property does meet the minimum acreage standard established within the Zoning Code to be eligible <br /> for RPUD rezoning and exceeds five acres in area. Proposed Lot 1, Block 3, is approximately 200 feet <br /> from the estimated OHWL contour. The Planning Commission should discuss whether Block 3 should be <br /> reconfigured so that no parts of the proposed building lots are within 250 feet f the OHWL. This likely <br /> will require additional survey work to establish the location of the OHWL on the north side of Wayzata <br /> Boulevard. <br /> Also for discussion is whether to rezone the entire site to RPUD or just the area being developed. <br /> Although the approvals being requested at this time do not include development of homes in Outlot A, <br /> Page 11 of 32 <br />