My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-1999 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
12-13-1999 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2012 4:57:09 PM
Creation date
8/1/2012 4:57:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13, 1999 <br />0 ( #7) #2540 BRADLEYHOYT, 2523 KELLYAVENUE -Continued <br />and his client to present the City with information for a conclusive and accurate summary of <br />the facts. Jabbour said he is obligated on behalf of the City and Mr. Hoyt to perform due <br />diligence because the conditional use permit must be filed on the deed for the land. He said the <br />City needs additional information to make a proper decision. <br />Sheridan said he does not know what additional information the City needs. He said City staff <br />has been to the property and seen the retaining wall. He feels that is better than a drawing. <br />Jabbour said the person that the City asks to get a conditional use permit for three yards of <br />sand on the shore would be extremely disturbed if the City doesn't know how many yards of <br />dirt Mr. Hoyt put behind the retaining wall, if the City doesn't know how far he went into the <br />lake or if the City doesn't know if he obtained the appropriate permits from the Watershed <br />District or the Corps of Engineers or the DNR. All of that is part of the City's due diligence. <br />He said the Council could table this item and give the applicant a list of the documents <br />necessary for the Council to make a decision. <br />Sheridan said he and his client do not agree with that. He said the City has a current survey <br />and a survey from 1990 prior to when the house was built and based on comparing those two <br />surveys, staff has concluded that the applicant put rip rap in the water. He said that is an <br />erroneous conclusion. He does not believe that the retaining wall is a structure or hardcover <br />• and there is a structural engineer present who will testify as to why he doesn't believe that <br />either. <br />Jabbour said they should figure out exactly what the Council needs to facilitate the <br />application. <br />Sheridan said if Jabbour is going to ask his client to concede that the retaining wall is <br />hardcover, they will not do that. <br />Barrett said Sheridan is correct, that if he wishes to make a legal argument that the retaining <br />wall is not hardcover, he can make one and the City will make a legal argument that it is. He <br />does not feel it is fruitful to make that debate since it is clear that the City's position is that it <br />is hardcover. <br />Jabbour said there is a substantial amount of information that the City needs. He suggested <br />that the list be sent to the applicant in writing. <br />Sheridan said it should be contemporaneous with the decision they are making and not after - <br />the -fact. <br />Jabbour said this is a fluid issue and other issues might arise. He said the Council is trying to <br />bring this after- the -fact issue into compliance or find out if it is appropriate for the Council to <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.