Laserfiche WebLink
• ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 24, 1999 <br />#2159 Michael Renard, Continued) <br />Sansevere commented that the new shed would be an improvement to what currently exists. <br />Kelley inquired whether the Applicant is proposing to grow grass up to the residence and <br />removing all the existing sidewalk. <br />Renard stated that the walkway will be removed as part of the project. <br />Sansevere stated he would like the existing shed relocated away from the property line. Sansevere <br />inquired whether there already was a garage on this property. <br />Renard stated that a garage does exist on the property and that this shed would function as storage <br />for his two trailers. <br />Peterson commented that she would have requested in 1996 that the shed be removed as part of <br />the previous application, noting that she would be in favor of allowing the Applicant to keep what <br />he presently has but to relocate the shed to make it legally conforming. <br />Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant could obtain a building permit for the new shed if <br />• constructed to the same size without a variance application. <br />i <br />Gaffron stated that permits could be obtained to do cosmetic improvements and some structural <br />improvements. <br />,: <br />Mayor Jabbour inquired whether the Applicant would like the City Council to pass a motion to <br />enable him to build a new shed to the same dimensions as the existing one. <br />Renard stated he would certainly consider that proposal by the City Council. <br />Sansevere inquired whether anything could be done to accommodate the additional six feet that the <br />Applicant is requesting. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated he feels the recommendation by the Planning Commission should be <br />followed. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Application #2169, to allow the Applicant <br />to remove the existing shed at his option and to replace the existing shed with a new <br />shed to the same dimensions meeting the side yard setback requirements. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />E <br />