My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-2012 Council Minutes Board of Appeal & Equalization
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
04-18-2012 Council Minutes Board of Appeal & Equalization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 12:36:08 PM
Creation date
8/1/2012 4:27:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1„J <br />3 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO 2012 LOCAL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />Wednesday, April 18, 2012 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />Bockmann stated construction on the house was started in 1999. The property has been in the family <br />since 1951. The house was constructed new and finished in 2000. <br />Smerdon noted the last time they inspected the house was in 2000. <br />Bremer asked if the valuation has decreased down to $746,000. <br />Bockmann indicated it has. Bockmann commented he understands that lake front property has decreased <br />but that there has been an uptick on properties not on the lake. <br />Kunik stated every property type decreased in the City. Different neighborhoods experienced different <br />decreases depending on the sales. Kunik indicated those numbers that he cited earlier were averages <br />across the board for all of those property types. Kunik asked if they are located on the lake. <br />Bockmann stated they have 95 feet of lakeshore. <br />Kunik stated each bay is looked at in comparison to the other bays and what comparable properties sell <br />for as well as the amount of frontage on the lake. Kunik noted there is some fluctuation in each of the <br />neighborhoods from year to year and that the amount of decrease will depend on the age of the structure, <br />the size of the lot, as well as other factors. <br />• Bockmann indicated his property is .49 acre and is located next to a public landing with a gentle slope <br />down to the lake. <br />Kunik asked what Mr. Bockmann's issue is with the value. <br />Bockmann stated it is the dramatic drop in valuation in relation to the amount of taxes he has to pay. <br />Kunik asked if he feels the valuation dropped too much. <br />Bockmann stated the taxes should be in line with the value. <br />McMillan noted the assessor determines the house valuation and does not determine the taxes. McMillan <br />asked if Mr. Bockmann feels the market value is correct on his property. <br />Bockmann noted there have been two foreclosures on Loma Linda Avenue in the past year. <br />Kunik indicated that will have an impact. <br />Bremer commented it sounds like they probably did since his valuation dropped $208,000. <br />Rahn stated another issue„is the assessor has n6t- inspected the house in 12 years. <br />Kunik stated the biggest issue they have is whether they have inspected the property recently. The <br />assessor's office goes around every five years and inspects properties in a certain area. Kunik indicated <br />• they can look at the information the assessor's office has on the property and verify that it is correct. <br />Kunik stated in the cases where they are unable to inspect the interior of the house, they have to assume <br />the information they have on file is correct. <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.