My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3134
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3100 - 3199 (March 23, 1992 - November 9, 1992)
>
Resolution 3134
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
8/17/2016 12:58:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� 0,�. <br /> O O <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ��� �G'�'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> 9kESH�g' NO. 313 4 <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> September 16 , 1991 and June 18 , 1992 and recommended <br /> approval of the proposed variances based upon the following <br /> findings: <br /> a) The gazebo/bathhouse structure has existed on the <br /> property prior to 1968. Current standards for <br /> develcpment of lakeshore properties were adopted in <br /> 1973 by the City. <br /> b) The structural improvements completed for the <br /> gazebo/bathhouse structure did not involve expansion of <br /> the existing building envelope of structure nor did it <br /> involve an intensification of structure. <br /> c) There currently exists 4,554 s.f. or 43.28$ hardcover <br /> within the 75-250' setback area. Applicant proposes <br /> the removal of 1,105.05 s.f. or 10.53$ of existing <br /> hardcover to offset proposed structural improvements. <br /> d) The current proposal minimizes the impact on existing <br /> steeper topographies to south side of property. <br /> 4 . The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to <br /> other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, <br /> light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the <br /> effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.