Laserfiche WebLink
r.. - � � . ... . . . . . . <br /> � Ci.t o� ORONO <br /> - - �' <br /> • � � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2 815 <br /> • - • • <br /> A R$SOLOTION GRANTING <br /> PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A <br /> 2 I,OT PLAT AT <br /> 2300 LONGVIEW CIRCLE <br /> FII,$ NO. 1528 <br /> WHEREAS, Constance M. Scott (hereinafter "subdivider") <br /> on Apri1 26, 1990 filed a formal subdivision application with the <br /> City for approval of a 2 lot residential plat of property legally <br /> • described as Lot 5, Block l, Longview, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> _ (hereinafter "property") ; and �� � <br /> WH$REAS, after due published and mailed notice in <br /> accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq., and the City <br /> of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes , the Orono Planning <br /> Commission held a public hearing on May 21, 1990 at which times <br /> a1 1 persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were <br /> given the oppartunity to speak thereon; and <br /> � WHER$AS, at their regular meeting held on June 11, 1990 <br /> • the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of <br /> Constance M. Scott, noting the following findings of fact: <br /> 1. The property is located within the RR-1B Single Family <br /> Rural Resideritial Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2.0 <br /> acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly <br /> created lot. <br /> 2. The property contains a total of approximately 4.0 <br /> acres, all af which is considered dry buildable lands. � <br /> 3. Each of the lots contain 2.0 acres of dry contiguous <br /> land, and each meets the required 200' width to the rear of <br /> the 50' front setback line. <br /> 4. On-site septic testing confirms adequate and suitable <br /> areas for on-site septic development on the propased new lot <br /> (Lot 1 ) and adequate and suitable area for �on-site septic <br /> development for an alternate system on proposed Lot 2. <br /> 5. All existing improvements on proposed Lot 2 meet the <br /> required setback from the newly proposed division line. <br /> 6. Each lot can continue to be developed for residential use <br /> without the need for variances to the RR-1B zoning standards � <br /> or on-site septic� code of ��he City. <br /> • - � Page 1 of 3 <br />