Laserfiche WebLink
. . Item#09-CC Agenda-OS/14/07 <br /> File#07-3259[Total Perges 41J � T . <br /> NBNUTES OF TI� �. � <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION MEETING <br /> . Monday,Apri116,2007 . <br /> � 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Kempf iioted there is an e�;isting swimining pool which is driving sonie of the variances and that the <br /> � applicai�ts have gone tluough a number of plans,with the Planning Cornnussion recommending that the <br /> struciure be pushed further bacic. Kem�f stated it is unusual to allow a new structure with the same <br /> � variance allowances as a remodel but that it was felt by the Planning Cornmission that this was the best <br /> route to go. 4 � <br /> Sinolek stated the garage footprint is proposed to remain. The existing space under the garage would be � <br /> remodeled, with the stairway to the upper level being reinoved. <br /> Kempf stated the Planning Coinmission does not have a problem with the lot area variance. Kempf <br /> inquired whether there is any opposition to the side yard setback., <br /> Gaffron stated the side yard setback is proposed at 9.1 foot for the garage where there should be 10 feet. <br /> Kempf stated tlie reinaining outstanding issue is the hardcover and that in his view the Council should <br /> � weigh in on that issue. � <br /> Chair Kempf opened the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. • <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. � <br /> Chair Kem�f closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. � � . <br /> � Kang moved;Kroeger seconded,to recommend approval of Ap�lication#07-3259,Lake Country <br /> Builders for it.athy and Gary Gangsiee,i37�x'test Point�uad,grantinb of harcicover variarices <br /> ' for the 75-250 foot zone and the 0-75 foot zone,granting of a lot area variance, a side setback <br /> variance, and a variance to accessory structvres. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 4. #07-3262 JAIVfES AND �OgtRiNE Ii�CK,3820 C�IERRY AV7ENUE,vAgtlr�,1�ICE <br /> 6:56—7:11 P.M. � <br /> � James Beck;Applicant, and Kathy Alexander,Architect,were present. <br /> Curtis stated at the February 20��'meetin�,the Planning Cornmission directed the applicants to revise � . <br /> their plans to show the following: . <br /> I. No second story encroachment on the side��ith the substandard setback. � <br /> � 2. Total�eak height revised so that it is not much higher than the existing home's peak height on <br /> the lake side. . <br /> The applicants were also directed to explore mitigation of any negative���etland impacts as a result of <br /> drainage from the property. <br /> �AG�, 6 <br />