Laserfiche WebLink
• Item#09-CC Agenda-OS/14/07 <br /> � � i � � ' File#07-3259(Tota�ges 41J <br /> �. <br /> � � NIINUTES OF THE . � ' �_��—e� <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIIS5ION MEETING <br /> • . Manday,Apri116,2007 <br /> • 6:00 o'ciock p.m. <br /> 3. #06-3259 LAKE COUNTRY SUII�DERS ON BEHALF OF KATHY Al\TD GARY <br /> . GANGSTEE, 1374 REST POINT ROAD,VARIANCE,6:45—6:56 P.M. � ' <br /> Ryan Smolelc,Architect,was present. � �, <br /> Gaffion stated the applicants have submitted a revised site plan,revised building plans and elevations, <br /> � and revised hardcover calculations. In these new plans,the existing house will be cornpletely removed <br /> and a new two-story home of approximately the sarne 1250 square foot footprint area and oriented east- <br /> west rather than north-south would be constructed to meet the required 30 feet sireet setback.The two- <br /> story cormecting link to the garage is still proposed. As a result of these revisions and the consideration <br /> � of this site as a total replacement,the following variances are required: . � <br /> . 1. Lot area(0.65 acre where 1.0 acre is required); , � <br /> � � . ��F�� <br /> _ 2 Hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone.�percent is proposed where 30.3 percent exists and 25 <br /> percent is allowed; . ' <br /> 3.. Hardcover variance for the 0-75 foot zone. 7.72 percent is proposed where 9.0 percent exists <br /> and 0 percent is allowed; <br /> 4. Side setback variance for existuzg garage attaclzment and upward e�pansion. 9.1 foot existing <br /> � ' where 10 feet is required; � " <br /> 5. Variance to Section 78-1432,re; Accessory struchues. One of the property owners' goals � <br /> � continues to Ue tlie ability to retain�h�noiiconiornuty pool wluch is partially within fl1e 0-7� <br /> foot zone. . <br /> . The applicants have responded to the Plaruzing Cominission's direction fion-►the February�eeting. The <br /> primary issue for the Plaruiing Com7nission to consider is whether or to what extent a hardcover <br /> variance is ap�ropriate for tlze site. <br /> The Planning Gommission shoulci address the following: . <br /> 1. Whether the a�plicants should be granted a hardco�ler variance to be allotit��ed to keep the pool, <br /> given that it is a nonconfomuty and partially in the 0-75 foot zone, and that it is the primary <br /> reason for excess hardcover on the site, <br /> 2 Vlhether a hardcover Variance should be b anted for the 75-250 foot zone, given that this is <br /> considered as a total rebuild on a lot that is nearly confomling in width and has a substantial � <br /> hardcover allotment for the 75-250 foot z�ne. <br /> 3, Whether there is any issue with attaching the house to the existing garage that is slightly too <br /> close to the lot line. � '� <br /> Smolek stated the plan was revised ii1 response to the direction of the Plannin�Commission,�vith the <br /> hardcover also Ueing further reduced fi•om the last meeting. , <br /> ry�E 5 <br />